Background Image
Previous Page  35 / 141 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 35 / 141 Next Page
Page Background

Improving Institutional Capacity:

Strengthening Farmer Organizations in the OIC Member Countries

25

control from outside the movement, members’ involvement in the management of

cooperatives eroded. Primary cooperatives and unions increasingly became indebted so that

they could not effectively provide services to members.

30

Thus, this study investigates whether an apex body for farmers exists in a given country, and

also whether the body was government-linked (including semi-autonomous parastatal

organizations) or independent. In total,

81% of countries (

42 out of 52 analyzed) have some

sort of apex co-operative, federation, or national farmers’ union, as shown in the table below.

These bodies were marginally more common in the African group, where they were identified

in 15 of 17 countries (88%) than in the Arab or Asian groups. However, significant regional

differences emerged when the question of control was asked. In fact,

every identified apex

body in the African group is independent

, whereas 46% of countries in the Asian group

have a government-linked apex body, meaning 60% of the 10 bodies identified are

government-linked. In total, 10 countries (19% of the sample) have a government-linked apex

body. These represent

24%

of the total 42 bodies identified.

Table 3: Existence and control of apex FO bodies in OIC member countries

31

Group

Yes, independent

Yes, government-

linked or run

No body identified

African Group

88%

0%

12%

Arab Group

59%

18%

23%

Asian Group

31%

46%

23%

Total

62%

19%

19%

It should be noted that even when apex bodies are independent, this may not be enough to

ensure autonomy and proper functioning. As the ILO notes

32

about apex bodies in the Arab

world,

“Cooperative apex organisations function as if they are State parastatals. Recognition

of the movement’s autonomy and independence and acceptance of cooperatives as a

different type of enterprise is generally not evident. A common misconception among

the general public is that cooperatives “should be” controlled by the State to avoid

“corruption”. On the ground, it has also become common practice and an integral part

of general cooperative policy that government should be kept in the loop about

cooperative activities, as a sign of recognition.”

Therefore, the statistics above should be considered a point of departure for further analysis of

the farmer organization environment in OIC member countries, rather than the final answer.

Is there an apex marketing body for the most important crop, and who controls it?

Marketing bodies or marketing boards are common national-level structures dedicated to the

promotion and coordination of crop marketing efforts. They can play roles that range from

simply assuring price stability to being the sole legal buyer of all goods in a given crop (a

30

Kyazze, Lawrence, “Cooperatives: The sleeping economic and social giants in Uganda”, Co-op Africa Working Paper 15

,

ILO

2010

31

These statistics are calculated based on the sample of countries covered by the research (51 out of 57 OIC countries). Full

categorization by country, and the sources used to determine the answer, are given in “Question 2” in the table in Annex 1.1

32

Polat, Huseyin, “Cooperatives in the Arab World: Reaffirming their validity for local and regional development”, ILO 2010