Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  171 / 213 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 171 / 213 Next Page
Page Background

Improving Agricultural Market Performance:

Creation and Development of Market Institutions

157

private sector and other role players, to help smallholder farmers and entrepreneurs

to plan their production and market activities more effectively in accordance with

market requirements, as well as to participate actively and effectively in the

mainstream markets

8.

Agricultural market finance

- The commercial agriculture sector usually has access

to finance through commercial banks, but finance has not been easily available to new

and smallholder farmers. The Government will design a suitable financing program

that will strive to support smallholder farmers and land reform beneficiaries in their

market needs. The program will strive to increase access to, and improve the quality

of, agricultural support services such as market infrastructure, agricultural market

information, and market skills development. The Government will also use financing

programs from various development finance institutions (DFIs) to achieve these goals.

Results of the 2010 Policy and Previous Reforms

Total support to agriculture was estimated at 0.3% of GDP in 2013-15. Direct market price

support (MPS) to farms is the largest component of this support, which is based mainly on

farm output and use of inputs. Other elements include payments to fund the national

agricultural knowledge and innovation system, and expenditure on infrastructure.

491

Price distortions are low, and except for sugar and, more recently, milk and wheat, domestic

prices are “almost aligned with world price levels.” Most policy measures and direct payments

target smallholders, largely in the form of production loans to new farmers who have acquired

land through redistribution. Reduced market price support and budgetary support to

commercial farms (most of them white-owned) not only reduced the overall level of support to

agriculture, but also freed up resources to fund land reform (hitherto based on a “willing

seller-willing buyer principle to acquire white-owned farms) and support to its beneficiaries,

principally black subsistence, smallholder, and commercial farmers.

492

Land redistribution policies were also changed, following earlier, unsuccessful land

redistribution programs, which failed to establish clear ownership rights and obligations and

which transferred land to inexperienced cooperative groups on unfavorable terms. Under the

New policies, all newly acquired land has been registered as state-owned on the Agricultural

Land Holding Account – administered by the Department of Rural Development and Land

Reform – and leased to selected beneficiaries, who have the right to dispose of the land after an

agreed lease period, provided the project is economically viable.

Following severe droughts in 2014 and 2015 (which cut the maize harvest by 40%),

Government repurposed some agriculture support funds to drought relief and committed new

funds, much of which went for provision of water, transport, and livestock feed. The land

reform process continues to receive funding, including support to recapitalize failing farms.

The 2016 OECD Agricultural Monitoring and Evaluation review observed that;

“The main challenge…continues to be implementing and effectively targeting support

programs that are tailored to the needs of emerging farmers. Involving private

stakeholders (experienced commercial farmers) in [these] programs in the form of

491

OECD (2016),

Agricultural Policy Monitoring and Evaluation 2016

, Paris: OECD Publishing.

492

Ibid