Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  169 / 213 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 169 / 213 Next Page
Page Background

Improving Agricultural Market Performance:

Creation and Development of Market Institutions

155

The 2010 Agriculture Policy

In 2010 the Department of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries issued a new policy document,

whose purpose it was to help make South African agriculture more globally competitive.

It enshrined liberal principles of non-intervention in markets except to correct market failures

or imbalances.

The underlying principles for the policy were:

1.

Government intervention in agricultural market should be limited to the correction of

market imperfections and socially unacceptable effects.

2.

Government intervention in agricultural market should prioritize targeted non-

market mechanisms over correction of socially unacceptable conditions.

3.

Government intervention in agricultural market should allow for export market

arrangements which enhance the welfare of the nation as a whole.

These principles informed a set of policy objectives, which in turn led to a set of policy

interventions and mechanisms.

The policy objectives were to:

1.

Promote competitiveness in agricultural markets;

2.

Create a strong linkage between primary producers and markets;

3.

Foster participation and success of smallholder farmers in the agricultural economy;

4.

Promote market in value-added agricultural products;

5.

Provide a common understanding and directives within Government and its

institutions and the agriculture industry of agricultural market policy and the

application and implementation of policy instruments;

6.

Provide strategic policy direction that can form part of Government’s plans of action

and that can be reviewed and monitored to measure progress;

7.

Provide broad direction on how agricultural market can contribute to the growth

objectives of the Government.

The policy interventions and instruments that followed from these objectives were:

1.

Competition and pricing policy

- With deregulation of market arrangements for

most, there was a danger that the potential benefits of deregulation could be

counteracted by market concentrations that were nurtured by the former control

board system. In ordinary circumstances, ordinary duties shall be applied, which are

limited by negotiated agreements and obligations enshrined in the WTO. The tariff

equivalents set through the process of complying with the WTO commitments

represent the maximum level of tariff that can be levied, and these are bound against

an increase. WTO rules also require that the bound tariff levels must be reduced by

specified percentages over the periods indicated in the agreements. As a matter of

policy, ordinary duties will be constantly reviewed in collaboration with the private

sector to ensure that tariff levels applied are consistent with the stated policy

objectives of making agriculture efficient and competitive.