Background Image
Previous Page  120 / 161 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 120 / 161 Next Page
Page Background

Retail Payment Systems

In the OIC Member Countries

102

good practice that might be adopted by other countries in order to speed up the clearing

process and prevent cheque fraud.

Innovation in retail payments is important, especially given the volatility and diversity of

systems available. Liberal regimes have so far had good results in stimulating and diffusing

innovation in payment systems, especially among the larger economies such as Indonesia and

Turkey. In some countries foreign workers and expatriates should be considered as actors and

in the UAE and Egypt they have had some influence in bringing innovation to the country.

Most OIC countries remain cash-dominant. However, our study shows the increasing growth of

credit transfers in Turkey, UAE, and Indonesia, among others. Governments can make a

difference by encouraging the use of non-cash instruments and moving towards the cashless

society. Their influence is most direct with regard to governmental services such as taxation,

licensing, penalty payments and for procurement. This can be particularly useful to combat

corruption and money laundering. OIC Member States must also realise their role in combating

money laundering and the financing of terrorism.

6.3 Authorities

All of the large-value payment systems are developed, managed, and controlled by central

banks or, as in Turkey, by an independent supervision and regulatory agency. However, retail

payment systems show some variations. In Indonesia, for instance, MNOs have to comply with

the legal frameworks, laws, and regulations enacted by the central bank if they want to provide

mobile money services. As with other conditions, there is no assurance that one system is

superior to another and bank-led, MNOs-led, or third-party led models are all apparent in the

OIC and each is capable of working. For the BCAO, the Ivory Coast authority has to work for the

whole of the WAEMU countries.

In summary, our recommendations are as follows:

1.

Financial inclusion and financial stability are the objective of payment systems. In order to

achieve both objectives, a comprehensive strategy should be adopted to develop sound

retail payment systems.

2.

Attention to retail issues by central banks is low and this needs to change. The initiative to

develop access channels to initiate and deliver cashless payments (e.g. POS terminals) has

been quite slow. The existing channels also not fully taken advantage of (e.g. ATMs) and

affect the limited interoperability.