Previous Page  46 / 247 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 46 / 247 Next Page
Page Background

The Role of Sukuk in Islamic Capital Markets

28

as a trustee and declares a trust over the sukuk assets in favour of the beneficiaries (sukuk

holders/investors) that have beneficial rights over the assets, entitling them to receive cash

flow from the assets, usufructs and/or investments. The trust assets hence comprise the

underlying assets as well as the related rights and obligations. As a means of credit

enhancement, these sukuk structures usually incorporate a purchase undertaking from the

obligor to buy back the assets or the investors’ ownership in the usufruct, investment and/or

partnership upon the redemption of the sukuk or in the event of a default. This purchase

undertaking is akin to a contractual claim against the originator for non-payment of the

sukuk’s financial obligations. As such, the level of protection afforded to investors depends on

the type of contract adopted and the terms and conditions of the sukuk structure. Table 2.4

summarizes the key legal, financial and risk implications of asset-based and asset-backed

sukuk structures.

In civil law jurisdictions which do not easily allow the setting up of trusts, alternative

structures have begun to emerge to allow sukuk transactions to be carried out in accordance

with the local laws.

Table 2.4: Asset-Based and Asset-Backed Sukuk

Implication

Asset-based

Asset-backed

Legal - ownership of

the assets

Originator/obligor transfers

beneficial ownership of the

assets to investors.

Legal ownership remains with

originator/obligor.

In the event of a default,

investors have recourse to

originator/obligor.

Transfer of legal ownership

of

the

assets

from

originator/obligor to a third

party (typically, an SPV).

Financial - cashflow

source

Based on originator/obligor’s

principal activities, although

structuring mechanism may

elevate the creditworthiness

of originator/obligor.

Based on cash flow generated

by the assets.

Risk – default

Investors have recourse to

originator/obligor.

Investors have recourse to

the assets and rights of

disposal.

Sources: ISRA, RAM

SPV – Country-Level Differences between Sukuk Mechanisms/Structures, Acceptability

from a Legal Perspective

Sukuk structures typically involve a legal entity, known as an SPV (special-purpose vehicle) or

SPC (special-purpose company) or SPE (special-purpose entity), which holds the sukuk assets

as an agent or trustee on behalf of the sukuk holders. Trust laws tend to be the preferred

mechanism when establishing such an entity. The characteristics of an SPV is described in

Figure 2.9.