Previous Page  24 / 49 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 24 / 49 Next Page
Page Background

Proceedings of the 14

th

Meeting of the

Transport and Communications Working Group

20

Islamic finance solutions should be considered for the positive implications these might have

on the mitigation of macroeconomic and financial credit risks. For the adoption of Islamic

finance in countries where this is not already the following basic steps could be considered

such as, amending the legislation and regulatory framework of the banking and financing

system, undertaking sensibilization campaigns on Islamic finance at the institutional level,

implement training programs dedicated to the improvement of the competences and skills

of the human resources.

Policy Recommendation V (Procedural measures):

Adopt risk management guidelines

and checklists

Risk management guidelines and checklists should be considered for adoption, were not

already in place for the overall improvement of risk management practices with reference to

all types of risks. Where these tools are already available, their improvement might be

considered. These tools should be country if not transport/mode-specific in order to reflect

peculiarities in the policy, institutional and regulatory settings. Guidelines should be tailored

to PPP initiatives and not generally applicable to infrastructure investments as PPPs are

more complex than projects developed and implemented under the public procurement

conventional model. Further to the identification of the main risks applicable to the PPPs

over the course of the different stages of project life-cycle, the entities responsible for their

assessment, monitoring and treatment should indeed be indicated. As of supervision and

monitoring activities, the scheduling/frequency of the reporting tasks should be also

specified. Standard templates for collection of project relevant information should be

preferably adopted.

Guidelines for risk management practices should cover all dimensions of risk governance. A

“legal attitude” to PPP risk management focusing on risk identification, allocation and

treatment should be combined with an economic approach to reflect the appropriate

management of risks at all stages of the project life-cycle integrating risk identification,

allocation and treatment-related analyses, with risk appraisal (ex-ante), monitoring and

evaluation (ex-post) of PPPs (including all different elements of analysis to be performed as

part of economic and financial evaluations, e.g. Value-for-Money, public sector comparator,

Cost-Benefit Analysis, sensitivity analysis, scenario analysis, risk analysis…).

Policy Recommendation VI (Statistics & surveys related measures):

Ensure PPP analyses

are based on reliable data and promote transparency

In order to mitigate financial sustainability risks, the tools and analyses developed as part of

pre-feasibility and feasibility studies should be based on the use of real data and/or surveys,

including the willingness to pay surveys.

Transparency increases confidence in the market by private investors and reduces

corruption risks. Accordingly, consideration should be given to the adoption of open data

policies concerning preparatory and feasibility studies, transport statistics, cartography,

transport models, etc. The collection and publication of information and data on the