Previous Page  23 / 49 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 23 / 49 Next Page
Page Background

Proceedings of the 14

th

Meeting of the

Transport and Communications Working Group

19

dominating the market may reduce the long-term efficiency in the provision of transport

services.

The capacity of the existing units should be strengthened as appropriate.

Policy Recommendation III (Technical measures):

Support the use of appropriate

technical tools, analyses, and competences

Rationale:

Pre-feasibility and feasibility studies should be preferably prepared by the public sector

following the identification of the PPP initiatives as part of national and sector-specific

transport plans. In-depth analysis should be performed at this stage by the public party also

using dedicated software and models. This is crucial to avoid public acceptance risks which

ultimately lead to financial sustainability risks.

The practice of the recourse to demand and/or revenue guarantees by the public sector to

implicitly cover possible imbalances between the demand and revenue thresholds required

to turn projects bankable and mitigate financial sustainability risks, may be substituted by

alternative remuneration/regulatory schemes such as the Least Present Value of Revenues

(LPVR) approach, share-in-profit/Joint Venture approach or shared implementation

responsibility.

At the tendering phase, projects should be preferably at an advanced stage of maturity to

avoid risks related to changes in the project scope which can lead to contract renegotiation

risks.

Independent consultants and engineers should be recruited for due diligence and auditing

procedures of feasibility studies as well as technical design documentation, project

implementation, and operation monitoring procedures.

To mitigate fiscal risks, the authorities responsible for the state budget should estimate and

monitor the impact on the state budget of PPPs related contingent liabilities and fiscal risks.

This should be done on a project-by-project basis as well as with reference to the system of

active PPPs. Reports on all direct fiscal commitments and contingent liabilities should be

elaborated on a periodic basis (at least annually), also depending on the number of PPPs.

Policy Recommendation IV (Legislativemeasures):

Improve the legal framework adopting

a PPP tailored legislation

Rationale:

Also depending on the number of PPP initiatives implemented or foreseen to be implemented

in a country, consideration should be given to the adoption of a PPP dedicated regulatory

framework. Tailored to PPPs this would address more appropriately the specificities related

to this type of procurement method, also providing a standard set of provisions potentially

mitigating risks of contractual disputes and renegotiations. Attention should be also given to

the inclusion in the new or existing PPP legislation of provisions concerning transparency in

the procurement of PPP initiatives, limiting as far as possible the use of the unsolicited

proposal and direct negotiation procurement methods.