Background Image
Previous Page  58 / 176 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 58 / 176 Next Page
Page Background

Improving Banking Supervisory Mechanisms

In the OIC Member Countries

41

Table 7: Banking Activity Regulations (Selected OIC Countries)

Source: World Bank, Bank Regulation and Supervision Survey

These indices are directly related to the core principle on permissible activities for banks in

the system. This issue is particularly important in order to compare different institutions as

they are classified as banks however in some countries engaging in non-banking activities are

allowed. The preferred practice is to restrict institutions which are classified as banks to pure

banking activities to achieve a more effective regulation and supervision scheme.

In terms of permissible activities in the banking sector, OIC countries are as restrictive as US

on average, and regulations are more stringent than EU-27 countries. We do not observe

significant differences when comparing different income categories among the OIC countries.

However, most countries in our sample of OIC countries lean towards the more restrictive side

of regulations with an overall average of 7.9 where the average of our selected sample of OIC

countries is 7.7. After the crisis in 2008, we note a decrease in the stringency of regulations on

the permissible activities for banks, where the selected OIC drops from 9 to 7.7 and OIC

average decreases from 8.7 to 7.9. In terms of individual countries, we observe a similar trend

where countries move to a less restrictive regulatory scheme on banking activities. Based on

the available data for the selected OIC countries, Malaysia is the least restrictive one with an

average index value of 6 and Turkey along with UAE are the most restrictive countries with

average values of 9. For UAE, the least restrictive activity areas is securities activities. And

most restrictive ones are real estate and insurance activities. We observe a similar structure in

the banking sector where regulations are more stringent on real estate activities. This is an

important point regarding the increased size of the construction sector in these countries.

Bank Activity

Regulations

Survey Indonesia Kazakhstan Malaysia Nigeria Pakistan Turkey

UAE

Saudi Arabia Algeria

Selected

OIC

Average

Secuirity Activities

2000

2

1

2

2

N/A.

3

1

2

N/A.

1,9

Range 1-4

2003 N/A.

3

2

3

2

2

1

1

2

2,0

2007

4

2

2

N/A.

3

N/A.

1

2

1

2,1

2011

2

N/A.

2

2

2

2

1

N/A.

N/A.

1,8

Insurance Activities

2000

4

1

2

2

3

2

N/A.

2

N/A.

2,3

Range 1-4

2003 N/A.

3

3

3

3

2

3

3

2

2,8

2007

4

3

3

N/A.

3

N/A.

N/A.

3

4

3,3

2011

2

N/A.

2

2

3

3

4

N/A.

N/A.

2,7

Real Estate Activities

2000

4

1

3

2

N/A.

4

N/A.

4

1

2,7

Range 1-4

2003 N/A.

4

3

3

4

2

1

4

1

2,8

2007

4

4

3

3

4

N/A.

N/A.

4

1

3,3

2011

3

N/A.

N/A.

3

3

4

4

N/A.

N/A.

3,4

Overall Restrictions

on Banking Activity

2000

10

3

7

6

N/A.

9

N/A.

8

N/A.

7,2

Range-3-12

2003 N/A.

10

8

9

9

6

5

8

5

7,5

2007

12

9

8

N/A.

10

N/A.

N/A.

9

6

9,0

2011

7

N/A.

6

7

8

9

9

N/A.

N/A.

7,7