Background Image
Previous Page  57 / 176 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 57 / 176 Next Page
Page Background

Improving Banking Supervisory Mechanisms

In the OIC Member Countries

40

income categories, high-income, upper-middle income, lower-middle income and low-income

OIC countries. As a viable benchmark, we present index values for EU-27 countries and United

States. In conducting our comparisons, we follow the methodology by Barth, Caprio and Levine

(2013) and present the evolution of banking regulation and supervision practices in 7

categories together with their association to the Basel core principles:

Scope of Bank Activities and Financial Conglomerate Variables

Capital Regulations

Official Supervisory Power

Private Monitoring and External Governance

Deposit Insurance Schemes

Restrictions on Entry into Banking Sector

Additional Information from individual survey questions

4.2.1 Scope of Bank Activities and Financial Conglomerate Variables

Barth, Caprio and Levine (2013) have constructed indices from the survey questions, which

allow quantifying the degree and effectiveness of regulations. Variables regarding bank activity

aims at capturing the range of activities banks can undertake, i.e. securities activities,

insurance activities and real estate activities. Specifically, securities activities refer to

securities underwriting, brokering, dealing, and all aspects of the mutual fund industry.

Insurance activities are insurance underwriting and selling and real estate activities refer to

real estate investment. The index values for securities, insurance, and real estate range from 1

to 4, where larger values indicate more restrictions on banks performing each activity. In

particular, 4 signifies prohibited, 3 indicates that there are tight restrictions on the provision of

the activity, 2 means that the activity is permitted but with some limits, and 1 signals that the

activity is permitted. Finally, the another variable is constructed as the sum of these three

which represents the overall restrictiveness of the regulations on bank activity, which ranges

from 3-12, where higher values indicates a more stringent regulation.

Survey data cover the time period between 2000 and 2011, even though it lacks the

information on the current stance of the regulations, it provide valuable information on the

evolution of regulatory policies in selected member countries. For some waves of the survey

and for some questions, data for OIC countries are not available. As discussed above, higher

values indicate that activity is prohibited and small values signal that activity is permitted.