Previous Page  40 / 113 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 40 / 113 Next Page
Page Background

COMCEC Trade Outlook 2017

34

F

igure 40 shows top ten countries having the lowest and highest trade to GDP ratios in 2016.

United Arab Emirates had the highest share of trade in GDP with 138 per cent in 2016. On the

other hand, countries having the lowest trade to GDP ratios were Yemen, Sudan and Nigeria

where trade to GDP ratios ranged between 10 to 16 per cent. Some caution is needed in

interpreting the share of trade to GDP ratios. Because

t

he importance of trade is higher for small

countries (in terms of geographic size and population) than for the large, relatively self-

sufficient countries or those that have geographical disadvantage and high transport costs.

Moreover, several factors such as trade policy, economic structure, and the multinational firms

may account for the differences in this ratio (Love and Lattimore, 2009). On the other hand, as a

result of the undervaluation of local currencies in low and middle-income countries, the GDP

calculated on the basis of purchasing power parities is usually two to three times larger than

that calculated on the basis of current market exchange rates. Thus, the share of trade in GDP

may be biased and tend to be high in low and middle income countries (ICC OpenMarkets Index,

2013). This could explain why the ratio of trade is quite high in some LDCs of the OIC like

Mauritania.

Figure 40: Member States Having the Lowest and Highest Openness Ratios in 2016

Source: UNCTADSTAT

Trade Facilitation:

Trade Facilitation aims at easing the trade among the

countries through decreasing the burden of procedures and

trade costs. Firms face various costs when trading

internationally. Issues including export and import

procedures, customs formalities, transportation and logistics

problems may increase trade costs. Studies, such as WTO

(2004) and De (2009) suggest that higher transport costs is in many cases more restrictive to

trade than high tariffs.

Various studies have been conducted to measure the impact of transport constraints on

international trade. For example, based on their research on Middle East and North Africa

(MENA) region, Bhattacharya and Hirut (2010) suggest that reducing the transport constraint

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Per cent

Member States Having the Lowest

Openness Ratio

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

Per cent

Member States Having the Highest

Openness Ratio

“Trade Costs are

higher in Landlocked

Member States”