48
to be the creation of 83.5 new export lines for the host countries. Iwamoto and Nabeshima
(2012) have tested the impact on 175 countries. They found out that, FDI inflows have positive
impact on export diversification of the developing countries, but no significant effect on
developed countries. The reason according to the studies is that the Multinational Corporations
(MNCs) are more diversified and developing countries are affected by the spill-over effects of
the FDI brought by theMNCs. Another study by Hailu (2010), examined the impact of FDI inflows
on Sub Saharan Africa countries. The study found out that a 1 percent increase in FDI in the
previous year brings about 0.043 percent increase in exports of the following period.
Another obstacle faced by most of the Member States is the concentration of the export oriented
FDIs on traditional sectors. Harding and Javorcik (2011) underlined that, if the FDI exports are
only products that the host country already exports
intensively, the efficiency-seeking FDI could move
towards more specialized rather than more
diversified exports. Thus, FDI does not contribute too
much to export diversification. For example
according to UNCTAD (2011), which investigated the
sectorial distribution of the FDIs in LDCs, m
any large projects are in the form of greenfield and
expansion
projects
prospecting for reserves of base metals and oil. The study also cited the lack
of political stability and unavailability of skilled workers as main reasons for low performance
of investment in the manufacturing sector in Africa.
FDI inflows is also considered as the largest source of external finance for developing and least
developed countries where insufficient finance constitutes a bottleneck for development.
According to UNCTAD
30
39 per cent of incoming finance in developing countries and less than
25 per cent of incoming finance in LDCs is fromFDI. Global foreign direct investment (FDI) flows
which hovered around 1.3 to 1.4 in the aftermath of global crisis, increased to around 1.9 trillion
dollars in 2015-2016 period. However global FDI fell by 23.4 percent to 1.4 trillion dollars in
2017. Figure 57 illustrates the global FDI inflows and shares of developing and developed
countries versus OIC countries. The figure reveals that the developed countries is the largest
recipient of FDI with a share of 50 per cent in global FDI inflows while the share of developing
countries is 46.9 per cent in 2017. However the share of OIC countries in global FDI inflows
remained significantly lower, below 7 per cent 2017.
30
World Investment Report,2018
“FDI Inflows are inadequate
for export diversification
in many OIC Countries”