Previous Page  104 / 164 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 104 / 164 Next Page
Page Background

Malnutrition in the OIC Member

Countries: A Trap for Poverty

COMCEC

Stunting

Wasting Overweight

Anaemia

Wealth quintile: Middle

35.2

7.8

1.9

32.4

Wealth quintile: Fourth

34.5

8. 1

1. 8

30.2

Wealth quintile: Highest

29.1

9

2.4

26.7

Region: North Sumatra

39.7

9.2

1. 8

2 1 . 6

Region: West Sumatra

31.6

6

1.2

13.5

Region: South Sumatra

36.1

10. 2

0.4

35.6

Region: Lampung

31.1

11.9

2. 2

24.2

Region: DKI Jakarta

31.7

7.7

1.9

33.3

Region: West Java

32.9

6.2

1.5

30.8

Region: Central Java

30.7

10.5

2.5

33.9

Region: DI Yogyakarta

26.7

8. 1

3.8

34.8

Region: East Java

33.0

7

2 . 8

26.7

Region: Bali West Nusa

29.9

3.9

1.4

30.3

Region: Tenggara

48.8

10.5

1.0

53.7

Region: South Kalimantan

45.6

7.8

1.9

34.4

Region: South Sulawesi

38.2

10 . 1

1.5

41.6

Mean

35.3

8.5

1.9

31.1

Source: authors' calculations based on the IFLS (2014). Wealth index created by the authors with a factors

analysis.

Trends in Malnutrition

Figure 30 s

hows that trends in malnutrition are very different between types of malnutrition.

Indonesia has managed to reduce chronic malnutrition in a steady manner since 1995. The

prevalence of stunting has decreased from 48.1% in 1995 to 36.4% in 2013, which

corresponds to a decline of 0.65 percentage point per year. The pace of stunting reduction has

been remarkably constant over the entire period if we ignore the year 2004 which displays a

much lower, and hardly credible, stunting rate of 28.6%.14 Anaemia prevalence has likewise

decreased steadily over the period, from 51.3% in 1995 to 32.8% in 2010 (and 31% in 2014].

The pace of anaemia prevalence reduction has been sustained, at 1.2 percentage point per

year.

In contrast, acute malnutrition (wasting] has not gone down much from its 1995 level.

Prevalence of wasting had initially decreased from 14.9% in 1995 to 5.4% in 2001, but has

since then increased until 2013 to reach the level of 13.5%. Overweight has followed a similar

pattern: prevalence first decreased between 1995 and 2001 (from 6.5% to 1.5%) but has since

steadily increased to reach 12.3% in 2010 and 11.2% in 2013.

14The dataset used in that particular year is different the ones used in the other years, and has a much

lower sample size.

96