Previous Page  192 / 225 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 192 / 225 Next Page
Page Background

Forced Migration in the OIC Member Countries:

Policy Framework Adopted by Host Countries

182

By contrast, changing conceptions of national identity, particularly with regard to migration,

also matter. In Turkey and Morocco, a shifting self-understanding of each country as not only a

transit point for migration flows to Europe, but also as host and destination countries in their

own right has bolstered conversations around the creation of more comprehensive migration

and asylum laws—and even small steps toward integration policies. Further afield, a multi-

decade debate on whether or not Germany was an “immigration country” culminated in the

summer of 2015 in a broad societal and political movement to welcome refugees arriving to

Europe in large numbers.

5. Dynamics external to a country, including the involvement of regional bodies or

donor countries, can also influence protection approaches

While regional bodies and protection frameworks are underutilized and ineffective in many

contexts, there are some examples where they have successfully influenced national practice.

In Uganda, the OAU Convention has resulted in a broadening of protection to include some

categories of non-refugee forced migrants. Perhaps most notably, both the EU asylum

legislation and the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), which are binding on their

members, have had a substantial impact on asylum practice in Europe, including Sweden. Both

bodies of legislation have a court of appeals which offers the opportunity for individuals to

initiate legal challenges if they feel governments have violated their rights under the ECHR or

EU law. Beyond shaping the drafting of protection legislation in Europe, the appeals courts

have also had a direct impact on the practice of protection on the ground in European

countries.

Outside of formal regional bodies, countries’ protection approaches may also be influenced by

interested third countries, particularly those that are major donors of humanitarian

assistance. At a practical level, funding from international donors may allow asylum countries

to provide services, such as education in Turkey and Jordan, that might not otherwise be open

to refugees. Politically, leverage from donors may convince asylum countries to alter policies

on legal status or provide access to certain rights like the right to work. In Jordan, pressure

from donor countries regarding the status of Syrians—as well as additional aid and trade

concessions—persuaded the government to grant work permit fee waivers to Syrian refugees

although other national groups that had not been the target of international debate were not

accorded this same benefit. While in Morocco, domestic and international pressure following a

poor human rights report on the treatment of migrants and refugees in the country helped to

generate momentum for a whole-scale reform of the country’s migration regime.

III. The intersection of poverty and forced migration

Forced migrants’ circumstances outside their communities or countries of origin, as well as

their often tenuous legal status, expose them to unique vulnerabilities and often put them at

greater risk of social and economic marginalization.

The lack of a means to earn income and support themselves is a major vulnerability and risk

factor for poverty for most forced migrants. In some cases, such as in Turkey and Jordan,

practical or procedural barriers to obtaining work permits by refugees and asylum seekers

(particularly non-Syrians) prevent these groups from earning a living in the formal labor

market. In other countries, as in Sweden, Morocco, and Uganda, local labor market conditions

may limit the opportunities for refugees to work or the quality of jobs available. Where

refugees and asylum seekers do find work, they are often channeled into lower paid jobs or

forced to take employment in the precarious informal labor market. Child labor is often

reported as a coping mechanism among refugee communities, as has been seen among Syrian

refugees in Jordan and Turkey. Without a steady source of income, refugees and asylum