Forced Migration in the OIC Member Countries:
Policy Framework Adopted by Host Countries
178
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
This report paints a picture of the incredible diversity of forced migration—from its scale,
drivers, and legal frameworks—in and from the 57 countries that make up the Organisation
for Islamic Cooperation (OIC). But despite key differences among countries and regions, there
are several common challenges that have emerged, which are critical to a holistic
understanding of the impact of and approach to managing forced migration in OIC and around
the world.
Seven key trends in particular stand out:
1.
Forced migration is a dynamic, complex, and
far from linear process
;
2.
The international legal framework governing forced migration has remained static
while the drivers have evolved significantly—placing an
ever greater burden on
national and regional systems
to fill these gaps;
3.
National approaches to protection evolve over time
, based on both internal
dynamics (changes to a country’s identity or political dynamics) as well as external
dynamics (involvement of regional bodies or donor countries);
4.
Access to protection, legal status, and core rights thus
depends not just on
where
you are but also
who
you are
, even within the same country;
5.
Protection in practice also depends as much on
implementation capacity
at the
national and local level as on legal frameworks;
6.
Beyond basic safety and respect for human rights, the most significant challenge for
most forced migrants is the
ability to legally earn a living in displacement
—which
requires a supportive policy framework from national governments, but can also
benefit from significant investment and creativity from NGO and International
Organization (IO) partners.
7.
Finally, access
to
safe and affordable housing
is deeply intertwined with other key
poverty alleviation policy areas, including access to livelihoods, yet remains a major
challenge in all of the case study countries.
This chapter will examine these trends in greater detail and draw a few lessons on how the
case study countries, and OIC states more broadly, have tackled the challenges of forced
migration. Finally, the chapter concludes with some initial recommendations on how to
constructively manage forced migration.
I. Forced migration in OIC Countries
Migration is sometimes described in a linear way, with a single point of origin, transit, and
destination. But the reality is much more complex. Forced migration, in particular, is an
inherently dynamic process, through which individuals and families constantly acquire and
adapt to new information about dangers and opportunities en route. In part, this is due to the
fact that the drivers of forced migration are neither simple nor static. Issues such as civil war,
political instability, and forced conscription often overlap with environmental degradation,
mass poverty, and lack of livelihood opportunities—which can all become more or less salient
over time. These may also coexist with persecution based on individual characteristics
(religion, gender, sexual orientation, or ethnicity). Individuals may explore various resilience
strategies to cope with these challenges before crossing an international border—so forced
migration can occur months or years after triggering events (such as Syria’s civil war). In some
corridors, forced migration is circular, and can involve periods of return to the country of
origin. Indeed, most refugees are first displaced within their own countries.