Previous Page  127 / 253 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 127 / 253 Next Page
Page Background

115

2004; Sufean, 2002; 2009). Thus, every school has its own unique culture. However, among the

various factors, it has been argued that it is the school leaders‘ attitude and aptitude which

constitute the most important factor that strongly shapes a school culture. With this,

instructional leadership - among other types of school leadership - has been theorized to be

closely linked to school culture and effectiveness (McEwan, 2002).

The thirdmost perceived feature was the development of communication skills among students.

Teacher training and development programs, greater parental invomvement and alinging

curriculum with local standardas were all idenitified as the fourth most commonly perceived

features. This is consistent with the emphasis on holistic development and current emphasis on

21

st

century learning which focuses more on student-centered learning., While improvement of

physical facilities were not perceived as important, a large proportion of stakeholders perceived

greater provision of ICT facilities as important for improving education quality. Islamic or

Madrasah education was not perceived as an important solution to improve educaiton quality.

Equally, access to after-school hours extra tuition or greater provision of affordable private

school were judged by the majority of the stakeholders as not very important.

Figure 3.2.11: Main Barriers to Quality Education at the Primary and Secodnary Level

Source:

Authors’ calculation based on stakeholders survey data.

The majority of the respondents perceived government schools to be inadequately funded, both

at primary and secondary level. In order to elicit the education reform-related priorities and

preferences, stakeholders were asked to comment on a hypothetical situation where extra

funding could be made available to improve the quality of education. They were then requested

to identify three priority areas where this extra funding could be allocated, separately for

primary and secondary education.

Figure 3.2.12

summarizes the responses. The majority

identified hiring more teachers to reduce class size as one of the three most important priorities

for improving education quality. This is true for both primary and secondary education. In case

of primary, other perceived priority investment areas (in order of importance) were more

spending on school building, more scholarship targeting children from poor families, additional

funding for under-performing rural schools, ICT facilities for rural schools, increase in teacher

0

0,1

0,2

0,3

0,4

0,5

0,6

Lack of effective school leadership

Lack of school autonomy

Lack of funds

Pressure of external evaluation

Lack of facilities

Lack of teacher motivation

Lack of good teachers

Language of instruction

Inappropriate curriculum/book content

Lack of parental involvement

Other

Secondary Primary