Background Image
Previous Page  158 / 186 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 158 / 186 Next Page
Page Background

Urban Transport in the OIC Megacities

148

Traffic within the Ministry of Interior is responsible for the plan approval. After the approval the plan

is submitted to the municipality for implementation and the responsible department within the

municipality assigns companies or public transport service contractors to implement the plan (Arndt

and Döge, 2013).

Public Transport is mainly organized by the municipality in Tehran and the Traffic and Public

Transport Office reports directly to the Mayor. There is, however, a growing proportion of operations

and maintenance being outsourced to the private sector. As much as 40% of public transport

operations (excluding taxis) are run by the private sector (Allen, 2013).

5.5.6.

Infrastructure financing

In recent years, and especially in order to improve the quality of service, accessibility and efficiency

of the public transport services, Tehran Municipality has taken important steps to attract private

sector partnership into operating public transport services in Tehran. This has been especially applied

to bus services. This partnership provides the system with newer vehicles provided by private

companies and a higher quality of services than might have been achieved in the same timeframe by

public only operators. In 2006, there were only 724 privately operated buses compared to some 6,676

public ones (Allen, 2013).

The high capacity, high speed BRT lines are mainly operated by the public sector while the regional

and local bus services increasingly by the private sector. In less than 3 years, the total share of private

sector in annual trips reached to more than forty% (Allen, 2013).

In addition, there are some 80,000 taxis in Tehran and over the past few years around half have

changed ownership to be privately owned. These are differentiated by colour; green for those owned

by private companies and yellow for those privately owned, by the driver (Allen, 2013).

5.5.7.

Health

Since the late nineties, the extreme traffic congestion and the associated high levels of air pollution

have gradually become a major challenge from the city’s authorities. In Tehran, air quality becomes

worse at certain times of the year as the city is surrounded by mountains causing temperature

inversions and that trap the pollution over the city. During that period, motorized traffic is estimated

to be responsible for 80% of the air pollution. In addition, daily admissions due to stable angia were

significantly related to the CO levels. It was estimated that each unit increase in the CO level increase

the number of hospital admissions my one person. In 2003 the National Institute for Tuberculosis and

Lung Disease estimated that roughly 4,000 deaths per year could be attributed to Tehran’s particulate

matter alone (Arndt and Döge, 2013; Hosseinpoor et al, 2005).

The government passed the Clean Air Act in 1995 in order to address the problem of pollution in

Tehran and other large cities in the country. In addition, a 10 year air pollution mitigation masterplan

was developed and put into practice in 2000. The studies that led to the creation of the masterplan

were co funded by the national government, the United Nations Development Programme and the

Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA). The masterplan included improvements in vehicle and

fuel technology which were neglected due to the historically low process of fuel, introduction of

standards in production, circulation, and registration of vehicles, discarding and replacing of vehicles,

improving the quality of fuels and adoption of alternatives, integration with public transport planning

and traffic management, and training and promotion of public awareness. The masterplan was at first

implemented slowly as institutional, management, regulatory, enforcement and financial problems

delayed the effectiveness of the adopted measures.

5.5.8.

Social exclusion

Access inequality in Tehran results mainly from the lack of appropriate land use planning for low

income households. The urban poor have been neglected and marginalised in the urban development