Previous Page  218 / 298 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 218 / 298 Next Page
Page Background

Risk Management in Transport PPP Projects

In the Islamic Countries

199

Part of the mandate of the PPP unit is to build

capacity in the sector

, however no evidence

of such activities has been found for stakeholders of transport PPP projects. Both Ministry

of Transport and ADC strongly rely on private consultants for all activities related to risk

management;

The introduction of an assessment focused on fiscal aspects (impact of Fiscal Commitment

Contingent Liabilities) before the tendering phase represents a positive development

which will be probably put forward by the PPP Amendment Law. The novelty seems

especially appropriate in view of demand guarantees which public transport PPPs entail.

Nevertheless,

there is no evidence of analyses to verify the impact that a bundle of

PPPs can have on the state budget

. PPPs are still seen primarily as a way to deliver assets

without imposing burdens on state resources.

Policy recommendations

Building upon the conclusive remarks, the following recommendations are suggested.

Political measures

: In order to minimize risk perception of private investors, it is

essential for Jordan tomaintain its political support for PPP schemes and continue to prove

a trustworthy partner for the private sector. In this respect, Jordan’s excellent

collaboration with various IFIs should be preserved. In order to explore the attraction of

new funds for transport PPPs, the involvement of Islamic finance in this type of projects

could be subject to close scrutiny.

Institutional and organizational measures

: The reform of the PPP unit with its move to

the Prime Minister’s Office can be an opportunity for reflection on the maturity of Jordan’s

approach to PPPs. To this end, an international event with academics, stakeholders and

experts could be arranged, as a way to promote the new unit as well. The upcoming reform

should, however, capitalize the experience gained so far by the PPP unit and the various

contracting authorities.

Technical measures:

The expansion of the PPP model into public transport sector as well

as rail sectors calls for a rigorous and transparent way for calculating demand/revenues

guarantee. This calculation and the impact of fiscal commitment contingent liabilities are

typically done on a project-by-project basis. However, it could be useful to produce an

annual report which describes how the government assesses the exposure to PPPs and

reports on all direct fiscal commitments and contingent liabilities.

Legislative measures:

Possible amendments to the PPP law in the close future should

strike the right balance between alignment to good practices identified by international

organizations and involvement of stakeholders in the preparation and discussion of the

amendments.

Procedural measures:

Procedures set out in the guidelines represent a good basis for risk

management practices, but their implementation needs to be ensured. An effort should be

made in this direction starting with increasing the knowledge of the procedures by all

involved staff and with monitoring that the procedures are duly followed.