Previous Page  168 / 298 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 168 / 298 Next Page
Page Background

Risk Management in Transport PPP Projects

In the Islamic Countries

149

5.3.8.

Conclusions and recommendations

Conclusions

The case study on risk management practices currently applied to PPP projects in the transport

sector in the Republic of Mozambique reports on the main findings of the review of existing

relevant literature and documents.

The following issues have been identified in the study affecting the different stages of project

life-cycle:

Unclear process of

identification and selection of the projects

to be developed under

the PPP model and excessive use of the

unsolicited proposal

PPP development practice;

Lack of a

PPP centralized dedicated unit

and lack of units/departments within the main

involved ministries;

Difficulties of the

institutional setting

to appropriately and effectively develop and

monitor the implementation and delivery of the PPPs;

Lack of

human resource capacity

in the appropriate monitoring and management of the

risks associated with PPP projects.

All the PPPs implemented in the transport sector except the National Road N. 4 and Zambesi

Highways toll roads

42

, see the direct involvement of the national railway and port infrastructure

manager and operator as a shareholder in the equity of the PPPs. This solution was identified

aiming at improving the performance of the public sector in developing and managing the

railway and port infrastructure, benefitting from the know-how of private contractors and

operators and sharing the benefits from the joint venture.

Albeit sensible in principle, this solution presents the risk of possible conflicts within the SPV

due to potential underperformance of any of both parties, which would inevitably result in a

conflict also between the government and the SPV. Another risk associated with the above

scheme is that of identifying projects on the basis of the technical conditions of the

infrastructure, neglecting that PPPs should be sound initiatives primarily under the technical

and functional stand point. Public-Private Partnerships should indeed be Value-for-Money

projects to mitigate demand and traffic risks as well as liability risks. Accordingly, in the

development of rail-port projects attention should be given to the involvement of partners in

the SPV that can mitigate and manage the risks attributed to the private party and maximize the

effectiveness of the project in reaching its technical and functional targets. In the context of

Mozambique mine industry partners could represent an example in this respect as also

demonstrated by the involvement of the Vale company in the equity of the Nacala corridor

(Fischer & Nhabinde, 2012). An alternative option could be the involvement in the SPV of a

logistics operator that has of course strong interest in using the line to operate their services

42

For more details on the Zambesi Highways toll road, see Valério J. (2015), Concessão Nova Ponte de Tete e

Estradas. Available at

: http://www.crp.pt/docs/A48S181-8_CRP_T1_078.pdf