Previous Page  89 / 213 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 89 / 213 Next Page
Page Background

Improving Transport Project Appraisals

In the Islamic Countries

75

standardizing the analysis. And even if guidelines are available, the question remains whether

the guidelines specify all important parameters or only some of them. For example, the discount

rate was found to be defined in only 33% of the cases. A knowledge centre or other similar

platform that provides centralised state-of-the-art knowledge and expertise in transport project

appraisals can assist in breaking this barrier.

3. Capacity issues

From the responses to the questionnaire, it has been found that it is a struggle to have enough

capacity to prepare project appraisals for all transport projects. In order to have high quality

project appraisal reports, it is crucial to have qualified staff that is either able to perform the

appraisal or to review the appraisal when contracted externally. The respondents also raised

the issue of lack of expert personnel to perform demand analysis. The majority of the

respondents also indicated that no training programmes are available to build capacity for

transport project appraisals. The training of public officials in the preparation of project

appraisals at all levels of government is thus an element that can be improved upon by OIC

Member States.

4. No ex-post evaluation

To compare the forecasted with the actual state of the world, an evaluation should be carried

out at the end of the project life or after many years of operation. The goal of an ex-post

evaluation is to check the accuracy of the forecast and to analyse the reasons for any deviations

between ex-ante and ex-post results. Half of the respondents pointed out that ex-post evaluation

of projects is not carried out at all.

The importance of ex-post evaluation lies in the fact that it can constitute a significant learning

mechanism. Retrospective analysis may feed into ex-ante appraisal of future projects, for

instance by limiting optimism bias thanks to an improved collection of project benchmarks and

through an assessment of the conditions under which projects actually delivered expected long-

term effects. Therefore, clear rules on ex-post evaluation may contribute to an increased

effectiveness of project appraisals.