Previous Page  31 / 190 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 31 / 190 Next Page
Page Background

Planning of National Transport Infrastructure

In the Islamic Countries

20

Multimodal: examines pedestrian, transit, bicycling, and automobile, as well as rail (freight

and passenger), air, and water modes of transportation and identifies supporting land use

and programmatic strategies.

Furthermore, technical factors in NTI planning also deal with the extent of complementarity of

road, rail, air, and water based transport modes. Complementarity should be interpreted in the

way that these transport modes do not primarily compete with each other’s. Modern societies

experience a growing demand for passenger and freight movement. Accurate forecasting of the

total passenger and freight demand and the competitive (or substitutive) and complementary

relationships among transport modes are necessary inputs in planning, designing, evaluating

and regulating transport and supply chain systems (Tsekeris and Tsekeris, 2011).

Mapping the environmental burden as an effect of implementing transport infrastructure

projects and the associated changes in transport use, the so-called Environmental Impact

Assessment, is ideally being part of a national transport plan. Together with a socio-economic

evaluation, these assessments are mostly used to compare and prioritize projects, corridors, and

transport modes. The monetary and the non-monetary impacts are compared and weighed in a

systematic way for different alignments as a basis for recommending a specific alignment. This

is especially of importance for road projects that often involve issues of conflicting interests

(Fischer, 2006).

The identification of the impacts of a road project is based on the analysis of the possible

conflicts between the environment surrounding and the infrastructure to be implemented. This

analysis allows to link associate the sources of the impact with the different phases of the

infrastructure, namely pre-construction, construction and operation. To do so, there can be

distinguished two different levels of environmental consequences:

The primary impacts directly caused by the realization and implementation works and

that physically affect the natural and human heritage that create the environment of the

areas concerned.

Secondary impacts resulting from the primary ones. They can be perceived through

their impact reducing the environmental capital by destruction, removal or degradation

of the five main resources: soil, water, air, flora, and wildlife.

On a human level, these impacts are those that will affect the living conditions on the three

levels: economic activities, socio-cultural activities and quality of life.

In terms of assessment, López et al. (2009) argue that traditional transport infrastructure

assessment methodologies rarely include the full range of strategic benefits for the

transportation system. One of these benefits is the contribution to cross‐border integration. This

is a critical issue for the integration process of countries with international transport corridors.

Finally, a national transport master plan covers mainly transport infrastructure and

investments related to passenger transport and less on freight transport. Planning on

multimodal freight transport is mostly documented in a multimodal freight transport master

plan (or Road Freight Strategy as in the case of South Africa) to address the unique

characteristics, needs and impacts of freight movement.