Previous Page  68 / 189 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 68 / 189 Next Page
Page Background

Governance of Transport Corridors in OIC Member States:

Challenges, Cases and Policy Lessons

56

SECTION 2: GOVERNANCE OF TRANSPORT CORRIDORS IN OIC MEMBER

COUNTRIES

4

Governance of Transport Corridors from a National Perspective

This Chapter concentrates on governance of transport corridors from a national perspective. To this

end, a literature search was carried out focused on transport governance in OIC member countries. In

addition, a targeted survey was carried out focused on transport governance in OIC member countries.

Relevant aspects of the conceptual framework, with its seven governance domains, have been used to

assess corridor governance in OIC member countries. Summarised results of the literature review and

the survey are presented in this section, with more elaborate results of the survey and literature

review presented in Annex 3 and Annex 4 respectively.

4.1

Objectives and political support

Part of international transport corridors

Most countries included in the literature review indicate that their national transport system are part

of an international corridor. An example is Egypt that wants to promote the country as a hub of the

international trade between East and West. The country is planning an upgrade of the Mediterranean

Corridor by extending the expressway to the border with Libya and Palestine;

The link to the international corridors is confirmed by the results of the survey:

The vast majority of the respondents (75%) indicate that the transport corridors in their country

are part of a larger international corridor.

Political support and international corridors in national transport policy

In many of the reviewed countries, international transport corridors are high on the political agenda.

For example, in Mozambique it is stated that the transport sector (and the related corridors) is one of

the driving forces of real and sustainable growth and development. In Uganda, the Northern Corridor

is a very important part of the overall economic strategy and regional integration is high on the list of

policy priorities. This is also reflected by that fact that the biggest part of the national budget is spent

on the transport sector.

This link between the international corridors and the transport policy is confirmed by the results of

the survey:

Most respondents (67%) indicate that their national transport policies address international

transport corridors. Policy priority is also reflected by the fact that 87% indicated that corridor

development is high (25%) or very high (62%) priority.

In general, the transport corridors address a multitude of objectives

. Table 4.1

provides an overview

of what objectives corridors address, according to the survey.