Previous Page  128 / 189 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 128 / 189 Next Page
Page Background

Governance of Transport Corridors in OIC Member States:

Challenges, Cases and Policy Lessons

116

7.3.5

Infrastructure: financing, planning and programming

Sources of finance available to effectively ensure governance of transport corridors

The rules on financing the IGC and PS are laid down in the Agreement on Joint Financing of the

Permanent Secretariat of the IGC TRACECA. All members contribute to the IGC and PS on an equal

basis.

Financing by government(s) and international organisations/international banks

Since its inception in 1993, TRACECA was mostly funded by the EU. In the following years, the member

states slowly took over the funding, and in 2009 EU funding halted. Although the EU withdrew from

funding the governance institutions, they helped fund technical assistance projects. For example, the

LOGMOS project was initiated to develop a TRACECA action plan for 2016-2026. In June 2016, this

document was approved by the IGC as the strategic government for the coming 10 years.

Prioritizing investments

The LOGMOS Master Plan proposes 68 recommendations for transport improvements. Each project

was rated low, medium or high priority, yielding 29 high, 34 medium and 4 low priority projects. The

ratings are established based on studies and expert consultations. Most high priority projects relate to

measurements with a corridor wide impact, speeding-up border crossing, improvingmaritime and rail

transport, ease intermodal transport or harmonize national regulations.

Advocating for and coordinating themaintenance and upgrading of corridor infrastructure and

facilities

Advocating and coordinating maintenance is not included in the MLA.

7.3.6

Corridor performance monitoring and dissemination

Monitoring of corridor performance and management performance

Corridor performance is measured using the TRACECA Route Attractiveness Index (TRAX), which

shows the attractiveness of the transport industry and the relative attractiveness for various east-west

routes in terms of safety, reliability, cost and transit times. The permanent secretariat is responsible

for the monitoring of the implementation of the Action Plan. However, no information is available on

the methods.

Dissemination and making statistics publicly available

The PS is responsible for disseminating information on TRACECA activities, objectives and

achievements. Transport data and GIS maps are made available on the TRACECA website.

7.3.7

Promotion and stakeholder consultation

Promotion of the corridor

It is laid down in the statute for the Permanent Secretariat that National secretaries are responsible

for carrying out regular mass media surveys and maintaining close contacts with mass media.

Although TRACECA is more than two decades old, the current TRACECA master plan proclaims

“TRACECA is not a widely recognized ‘brand’” (LOGMOS Master Plan 2014, p. 29), and should

propagate the ease of transport between hubs and border crossings in the region, suggesting more

promotion effort by its institutions.

Involvement of stakeholders

With respect to various stakeholders, ministers of Transport are represented in the secretariat and

national authorities participate in working group meetings. It is said that the private sector is