Previous Page  125 / 189 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 125 / 189 Next Page
Page Background

Governance of Transport Corridors in OIC Member States:

Challenges, Cases and Policy Lessons

113

Legal Documents

Armenia

Azerbaija

n

Bulgaria

Georgia

Iran

Kazakhst

an

Kyrgyzst

an

Moldova

Romania

Tajikista

n

Turkey

Uzbekist

an

Ukraine

Agreement on Joint Financing of

the Permanent Secretariat (2005)

Agreement on the development

of Multimodal Transport

TRACECA (2009)

*

Amendments to MLA regarding

Technical Annex to the basic

Agreement on Fundamental

Principles of Railway-Ferry

Terminals Operation on the Black

Sea and the Caspian Sea (2015)

TRACECA Multilateral permit.

User guide and annexes (2015)

Signature and ratification

Kazakhstan, Ukraine, Moldova and Turkey are in

the process of acceding this agreement

Signed, not ratified

*

with reservation

Not signed

Source:

www.traceca-org.org

.

Harmonization of national regulations, standards and procedures

It is well established that progress towards a smooth transport infrastructure is made by addressing

soft infrastructure issues. For TRACECA, this was acknowledged in the MLA in 1998, considered one

of the main issues to address towards 2015 (TRACECA, 2007), and continues to be a major theme in

the latest TRACECA master plan developed in 2014 (LOGMOS Master Plan, 2014). Since the inception

of the MLA various technical annexes were added to the MLA, such as agreements regarding customs

and documentation processes and international cargo haulage permits. Although progress on this

topic was made, there is still much room for improvement on the ease of doing business in the region

as well as reducing excessive waiting times at the border (LOGMOS Master Plan, 2014). Such measures

require significant effort from all states to find consensus and from national parliament to adapt

national legislation.

For TRACECA in particular, soft infrastructure measures are challenging as the members are highly

diverse in terms of their legal basis (LOGMOS Master Plan, 2014). Some countries, most notably

Romania, Bulgaria, Turkey and Georgia, are more in alignment with WTO, EU or other international

standards, whereas other countries, mostly those who inherited institutions from the Soviet Union, are

still updating primary legislation. Moreover, different customs unions are overlapping the region, such

as the Eurasian Customs Unions compromising of Kazakhstan, Armenia and Kyrgyzstan.

7.3.4

Institutional framework

Organization and characteristics

The governance institutions, as foreseen by the MLA, are presented i

n Figure 7.8: