Previous Page  113 / 189 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 113 / 189 Next Page
Page Background

Governance of Transport Corridors in OIC Member States:

Challenges, Cases and Policy Lessons

101

and methods of monitoring data on trade and transport facilitation. Business process analysis, time-

cost-distance survey approach and time release studies are examples of methodologies taught during

the training. The goal is for the participants to be able to conduct a TTFMM in their respective country.

7.1.9

Assessment of transport governance level

The seven corridor governance domains of the UNESCAP Central Corridor, as presented in this section,

are ranked against the four defined corridor governance levels (information exchange; coordination;

cooperation; integration), as introduced in

Table 2.9.

The UNESCAP corridor governance levels are

presented below, based on the review of documentation.

Table 7.2 UNESCAP Central Corridor governance levels

Governance domains

Information Coordination Cooperation Integration

Corridor objectives and political

support

Legal framework

Institutional framework

Infrastructure: financing, planning and

programming

Corridor performance monitoring and

dissemination

Corridor promotion and stakeholder

consultation

Capacity building: technical assistance

and studies

Source: consortium.

7.1.10

Conclusions

The advantage of the Eurasian Corridors is that its objectives are based upon longstanding research

on transport infrastructure in the Asian Pacific in the region. Its initiator, UNESCAP, has been

established in 1947 and has extensive experience with initiating projects and capacity building

activities with respect to transport. There are various ongoing transport projects, such as the

development of the Asian Highway (2004), the Trans-Asian Railway (2006), Transport facilitation

(2012), and Dry Ports (2011). The Eurasian Corridors is a continuation of the implementation of these

initiatives. By establishing a governance platform on the corridor level, strategic transport planning in

the Asian Pacific is elevated to the next level of integration. The draft MoU recently published by

UNESCAP and which is to be signed by all members proposes the establishment of various governance

institutions to facilitate the cooperation in transport development between the nations (UN-ESCAP,

2017).

Moreover, the potential of the Eurasian corridor is in its size. The Eurasian Corridors are the most

extensive regional transport cooperation project in the region. The Central Corridor will be developed

in relation to the Northern- and Southern corridor, and together, cover the whole of the Asian Pacific

region. However, its size may be its greatest challenge. It is no small feat aligning the different views

and interests of so many different countries. The Eurasian Corridors covers 23 countries, 46 border

crossings, and 36 port cities. The Central Corridor itself crosses through 13 countries, and of the fifteen

border crossings, twelve are covered by bilateral agreements (UNESCAP, 2017, p. 125). To make

matters more complicated, many (transport) cooperation projects already exists in the region, such as

CPEC, CAREC, EATL, ECO, OTIF to name a few.