Background Image
Previous Page  52 / 111 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 52 / 111 Next Page
Page Background

39

organized exchanges (classified as homogenous goods), 20% were products with reference prices

(classified as intermediate), and 20% of exports could be considered as differentiated products.

The demand for exports from the region is at best sluggish and this is contributing to a widening of

current account deficits. MICs such as Senegal have witnessed a significant weakening of exports, while

oil-exporting countries, such as Cameroon, have also seen a gradual drying up of export receipts

especially in 2012 due mainly to lower fuel prices. Although LICs have seen an increase in exports the

rise has been fairly modest. In the smaller countries exports are benefiting substantially with the

commencement of production in new resource projects. These new projects have been financed by large

financial inflows which, together with import needs, have affected the balance of payments in those

countries. Service sector exports and the remittances continue to be strong across the region. Table 3.3

provides a data picture of the exports of goods and services of selected OIC counties in the sub-Saharan

regions.

Table 3.3 Exports of Goods and Services (% of GDP)

Countries

2004-8

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

Burkina Faso

10.6

11.3

9.8

11.4

10.6

9.9

12.6

21.4

25.7

28.4

28.8

Cameroon

27.7

22.7

24.5

29.3

31.0

31.1

23.5

25.6

30.7

32.1

33.0

Senegal

26.3

27.1

27.0

25.6

25.5

26.1

24.4

25.0

25.2

25.0

25.1

Uganda

14.8

12.2

12.3

14.3

15.6

19.8

20.7

21.4

22.3

20.8

21.5

Source: IMF African Department database, September, 19, 2012 and World Economic Outlook Database,

September 19, 2012

As the above data shows, the weakest of the exporting nations is the LIC, Uganda, with exports having

peaked in 2010 and then plateauing off till 2013. Burkina Faso has the most promising growth rate in

exports. It has more than trebled its rate from the start of the global recession (from 9.9 in 2008 to 28.4 in

2012). Cameroon’s larger share is accounted for by the fact that it is an oil-producing country with its

exports reflecting the market trends in oil exports generally. Mineral fuels, oils, and distillation products

accounted for more than 50% of the total export in Cameroon. For an oil-producing country the decline in

exports revenue from that sector could have a devastating effect. However, it has also had a positive

outcome in that it has pushed growth and development of other sectors where SMEs prevail. In fact, in

2008-2009, the decline in Cameroon’s export was as a result of fall in its oil export. This fall in oil

exports has had the effect of developing the non-oil sector, such as cocoa preparations, which is

composed mainly of SMEs

Compared to Cameroon the trajectory of growth in exports of the other three countries provides an

alternative scenario. The non-oil producing middle to low income countries have been able to show better

a positive trend over the past 10 years, despite the recessionary global economic climate. In all cases,

though, we are seeing some drop in exports in the final quarter of 2012 and the first quarter of 2013.

In general terms the strength of growth in the Sub-Saharan region has been assisted in part by supply- side

factors such as the expanding natural resource sectors and apparent changes in climatic conditions. LICs

have also seen better institutional facilities, the development of more robust policy frameworks, a reduced

burden of external debt and more attractive commodity prices. Against this it is necessary to weigh up

possible downside effects such as ineffectual policy measures in Europe, especially in the Euro area, with

potential spill-over effects across the world. This problem will not be limited to Sub-Saharan Africa. The

other possible downside is lower future output growth resulting from the slowing down of the major

economies and possible higher levels of fiscal adjustment. A 1% drop in the global growth rate could

shave 0.6 points off the growth rate in Africa. The worst outcome for a relatively small drop in output is

for countries which are dependent on one or two export commodities, with negative multiplier effects on