Background Image
Previous Page  14 / 111 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 14 / 111 Next Page
Page Background

6

1.3.1.Innovativeness

Innovation is defined as an introduction of a new product, a new process or a new organisational

arrangement, opening or identifying a new market and as the conquest of a new source of supply of

raw materials or half manufactured goods (Schumpeter, 1934). Innovation is considered to be an

important element of a firm’s strategy to gain competitive advantage and maintain its dominant

position in the market.

International trade models developed by Vernon (1966) and Krugman (1979), amongst others, suggest

that innovation is the driving force behind exports. As developing countries imitate the innovative

products exported from developed countries, they will later be able to export these matured products.

For developed countries, they have to innovate to keep up their export and income. More recently,

Grossman and Helpman (1991, 1995) in their monopolistic model, show that certain factors

(technological innovation) could shift a country’s export demand curve outwards.

At the firm level, it has been argued that innovating firms have incentives to expand into other markets

so as to earn higher returns from their investment (Teece, 1986). Innovating firms will obtain and

sustain their competitive advantage not only in the domestic market but also to enter the global

market. Therefore, we can expect a positive linkage between innovation and exports. Local suppliers

and partners can get closely involved in the innovation process, thus ensuring a better match with

customers’ requirements (Mitra and Abubakar, 2009). Despite problems of endogeneity (innovation

affects performance but improved performance may affect innovation) most studies controlling for

endogeneity confirm the positive relationship.

Technological advancements explain, in part, superior export performance. The characteristics of the

specific technological and learning processes affect the relationship between technological

investments, innovation, and export market gains according to the technological intensity of sectors

(Montobbio and Rampa, 2005).

Firms enjoy benefits of the innovation in terms of cost reductions, new markets and potential

monopoly rents (Wakelin (1998). Innovating and non-innovating firms behave differently both in

terms of probability of exporting and the level of exports, implying that the capacity to innovate

changes the behaviour of the firm. Another result of the Wakelin (1998) study is that the production of

innovations at sector level improves the probability of all firms exporting, no matter if they are

innovative or not, which implies that the innovative environment is important and would encourage

firms to export, even though the same relationship was not supported by the results of the export

propensity. This might indicate that positive spill-over effects are significant for the increase of

probability for first-time exporters, but not for the increase of export propensity.

1.3.2.Proactiveness

Proactiveness, as described by Kropp et al. (2005), is the opportunity-seeking and forward-looking

perspective that involves introducing new products/services and acting in anticipation of future

demand. Entrepreneurial firms demonstrate proactive behaviour when they monitor trends in their

environments for opportunities that could be explored and exploited to their advantage (Shane and

Venkatraman, 2000; Brown, Davidsson and Wiklund, 2001). In addition, proactive firms are those that

visualise market opportunities by taking the lead to introduce new products, technologies and

procedures to the market ahead of the competition (Eckhardt and Shane, 2003). Proactive behaviour

has to do with the initiation of exporting as a deliberate management activity versus initiation of

exporting as a result of an unsolicited export order (Samiee, Walters and Dubois, 1993; Yeoh and

Jeong, 1995; Shoham, 2006; Balabanis and Katsikea, 2003).