Background Image
Previous Page  63 / 141 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 63 / 141 Next Page
Page Background

Improving Institutional Capacity:

Strengthening Farmer Organizations in the OIC Member Countries

53

funded civil society organizations and accepting in-kind contributions in the form of training,

material, and personnel.

The SPI also has adequate communication infrastructure, allowing it to engage effectively with

its membership. In the spheres of governance and accountability, the SPI performs relatively

well, by regularly engaging members through telephone, SMS, and email. Even more integral to

the FO is its annual meeting of the National Council, where the union’s operational activities

are communicated and members elect their leaders.

Challenges of the SPI

The main challenge the SPI faces is in the provision of technical assistance and other services,

especially physical infrastructure and financial services. This is due in part to its constrained

resource base (as mentioned, it lacks diversified revenue sources and members’ fees are only

US$1 per year). Another challenge is in one component of governance, as the five-year gap

between these General Assemblies means that members may not have a direct role in choosing

leadership and programmatic direction as frequently as they may like.

3.4.2.

The KPA

The KPA is an organization similar in type to the SPI but with a different history and slightly

broader membership base, as allied businesses and agrarian service providers are also

included in the membership. Characteristics are shown in the following table.

Table 17: Summary of the KPA

78

Type

National-scale; federation

Mixed gender; predominately smallholder

Origin

Established on September 24, 1994, as a consortium of women, farmer, and NGO

organizations to promote agrarian reform in Indonesia and achieve justice and welfare

for poor and marginalized rural people.

Purpose

Views itself primarily as an advocacy body that works toward a fair agrarian system in

Indonesia, characterized by the following goals:

Equality of allocation of agrarian resources to Indonesian rural folk

Assurance of ownership, possession and use of agrarian resources for peasants,

fishermen and indigenous peoples

Prosperity of poor rural communities in Indonesia

Footprint

Consists of 120 farmer organizations, with regional representation in 23 provinces across

Indonesia including: Java (West, Central and East), Sulawesi (Central and South), West

Kalimantan, Bali, Sumatra, Bengkulu, Jambi , Papua and Lampung

Service

provision

Provides the following services for members:

Advocates on agrarian reform and land use policy, to ensure land tenure security for

its members

Disseminates information on ecologically sustainable production

Provides legal and paralegal services to farmers facing evictions or legal challenges to

their land ownership or tenure

Links farmers and FOs to input providers and financial service providers and other

related organizations

Provides training programmes such as ‘

Advanced Villages for Agrarian Reform’

or

‘Damara’, which aims to create integrated collective farming units and joint business

entities at a local and community level

Provides training on the development of co-operative and peasant enterprise, with a

78

This table is based on interviews with KPA leadership in Indonesia in October 2014