Improving Institutional Capacity:
Strengthening Farmer Organizations in the OIC Member Countries
17
Society (ESC) came into force as applicable to all member states in 2006, establishing a new
type of cross-border cooperative.
23
Does the government have a body with the specific mandate to work with farmer
organizations?
The creation of a specific, funded department or body with the mandate to interact with and
strengthen farmer organizations – or co-operatives in general, as is sometimes the case – is an
important sign of a favourable policy environment, as it represents a tangible commitment
from the government and provides a vehicle for service delivery and policy discussions with
FOs. While it certainly does not guarantee successful service delivery (as the case studies will
show, the field-level execution and implementation quality of these agencies is often a
concern), it is another important precursor to success. Thus, the researchers attempted to
determine from public documents whether such bodies exist, under the Ministry of Agriculture
or elsewhere.
In general, the research has revealed that
73% of countries (
38 of 52) have an identifiable
body with such a mandate. A further 11
(21%)
do not, and the answer could not be
determined in 3, due to lack of available information on government structures. Regional
breakdowns are shown below:
Table 1: Existence of government bodies with a mandate to strengthen FOs
24
Group
Yes, identified body
No
Unclear
African Group
76%
12%
12%
Arab Group
68%
27%
5%
Asian Group
77%
23%
-
Total
73%
21%
6%
Note that while Arab Group countries were found to have the fewest bodies dedicated to the
promotion of and interaction with co-operatives or farmer organizations, 3 out of the 6
countries without such bodies (Bahrain, Oman, and the United Arab Emirates) are high-income
countries with less than 10% of the workforce engaged in agriculture, suggesting that the
governments may have chosen to allocate resources towards other areas affecting a larger
share of the population.
While comparative data is unavailable on a broad scale for the rest of the world, some studies
have found that dedicated departments for cooperatives are fairly common worldwide, so the
OIC is probably positioned similarly to other regions. For example, a recent report by ILO,
analyzing trends across nine countries (all but one outside the OIC) in Africa found that in all
nine countries, a ministry is held responsible for the legal monitoring of cooperatives
25
. Within
the ministry there is an established institutional window (usually a department) for
cooperatives.
23
Ibid.
24
These statistics are calculated based on the sample of countries covered by the research (51 out of 57 OIC countries). Full
categorization by country, and the sources used to determine the answer, are given in “Question 1” in the table in Annex 1.1
25
Ethiopia; Kenya; Tanzania; Rwanda; Zambia; Lesotho; Swaziland; Uganda