Background Image
Previous Page  156 / 206 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 156 / 206 Next Page
Page Background

Improving Agricultural Statistics in the COMCEC Region

144

The SWOT analysis conducted in the case study countries showed that the main

weaknesses of the agricultural statistics systems in COMCEC Member Countries were

stated as poor organization, lack of resources and scope of statistics. Existence of a

legal base, regular budget allocations, well-qualified staff, awareness of the issues,

openness to international collaboration were stated as the strengths. As far as threats

are concerned, political instability, political pressure on statistics, lack of interest in

statistics, size of informal sectors, and lack of coordination are among the top issues

raised. Finally, the case study members mentioned remote sensing and GIS technology,

CountrySTAT, increasing donor support, developments in information and

communication technologies, periods of main surveys and censuses, and growth of

agricultural markets as opportunities to be exploited.

Having identified the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats it can be

summarized that the needs mentioned are: more resources, mainly in terms of

physical infrastructure and IT; better coordination, dissemination calendars, improved

dissemination outlets; and qualified and competent human resources, consultancies

and continuous training.

It can be said that COMCEC Member Countries are not immune to the problems faced

with agricultural statistics all over the world. However, they are not significantly

better or worse than the rest of the developing world. There are wide variations

among member states in terms of agricultural statistical capacities, due to differences

in statistical infrastructures, resources allocated, methodologies used, outputs

produced and disseminated. The Index of Agricultural Statistics Development

constructed as part of this study is a tool to observe these differences in a systematic

way.

Nine of the COMCEC Members are classified to have well-developed agricultural

statistics. Eleven members of COMCEC have been classified to have fairly developed

agricultural statistics open to limited improvement. The third group of seventeen

COMCEC Member Countries has less developed agricultural statistics systems and

need major improvement. The remaining twenty COMCEC Member Countries have

severe problems with their agricultural statistics and are in need of serious

improvement efforts (Table 38).

In the lowest IASD category, 55 percent of countries are from the Arab group. The

shares of African and Asian group countries are 20 and 25 percent respectively. In the

top IASD category, on the other hand, 44 percent are from the African group and 22

and 33 percent from Arab and Asian groups. Therefore, the Arab group shows the

worst performance with the lowest share in high IASD category while having the

highest share in lowest IASD category (Table 39).

In the African group, 24 percent of the countries are in the lowest IASD category, 24

percent are in the highest, and the remaining 52 percent are in-between. In the Arab

group, 50 percent of the countries are in the lowest IASD category, only 9 percent in

the highest and the remaining 41 percent are in-between. In the Asian group,