Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  42 / 213 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 42 / 213 Next Page
Page Background

Improving Agricultural Market Performance

:

Creation and Development of Market Institutions

28

Developing institutional innovations – Developing the innovation so that it can be

taken to a next level and they can be distinguished from traditional institutional

approaches. The Islamic Republic of Iran introduced Integrated Pest Management

(IPM) as an approach in the 1960s in response to addressing the negative effects

associated with applied intensive agriculture technologies and the impacts of the

green revolution on human health and the environment. The initial attempt was not

successful and led the Government of Iran to further develop IPM according to the

Farmer Field School (FFS) concept as the solution to the socio-technical and

institutional shortcomings of conventional approaches in Iran. The first IPM/FFS was

established in 1999 and empowered farmer communities to acquire necessary

decision-making skills for individual and group action towards sustainable production.

Converging institutional innovations – Innovative institutions gain momentum

through a critical mass of participants implementing the innovative institutions. In

Benin, the Songhai Centre’s integrated production model is an example of a converging

institutional innovation. This production model is considered innovative in the sense it

creates a solid and integrated network of regional hubs that excel in sustainable

production and which have established local markets for sustainably produced goods

that are accessible and affordable for the majority of Benin’s population.

1.4 Conceptual Framework for the Study

Bringing together the previous sections on market systems, the agricultural and food market,

and the position of agricultural market institutions leads to the Conceptual Framework of this

study

( Figure 3 )

. The agricultural and food market is a strategic sector for nearly all OIC

Member Countries given its potential to address some of the most pressing concerns. A well-

functioning agricultural sector can support Governments to realize (agricultural) policy

objectives such as food security, food self-sufficiency, food stabilization, equal and fair access

to food, and reasonable prices. In a broader sense, a well-functioning agricultural sector may

support policy objectives such as competitiveness, industrialization, and rural poverty

alleviation. Therefore, it is not surprising improving agricultural market performance is the

heart of the economic growth in most of the OIC Member Countries and is a fundament of the

COMCEC’s strategy.

Governments rely on a number of agricultural market institutions to actively carry out these

types of agricultural market interventions. These market institutions are classified and defined

as follows:

1.

Commodity market regulation authorities

, which directly shape the agricultural

and food market through rules and regulations on, for instance, property protection,

governance, accountability systems, quality standards, and grades.

2.

Cooperatives

, which coordinate production, transportation, improve bargaining

power (and hence counterbalancing imperfect competition), and distribute inputs.

3.

State-owned economic enterprises

, which carry out producing, processing and

wholesale activities on behalf of the Government.

4.

Marketing boards

, which are commodity-specific organizations responsible for

various parts of the commodity’s market system such as production, processing,

distribution, transport, and trade, as well as promotion of domestic consumption and

exportation.