Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  162 / 213 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 162 / 213 Next Page
Page Background

Improving Agricultural Market Performance

:

Creation and Development of Market Institutions

148

widespread and accessible for small-scale farmers. The situation for mangosteen is similar as

many (Asian) countries do not import Indonesian mangosteen due to the spread of ants.

457

Indonesian farmers do not have access to technology to eradicate the ants.

Developing Current Market Institution(s)

BULOG is the key current market institutions through which the Government of Indonesia

intervenes in the agricultural market. BULOG’s main intervention capacities concern price

administration and stockholding program while it lost its exclusive import and trade

monopoly. However, as demonstrated in section 5.4.3, BULOG’s operations bring along high

opportunity and budgetary costs and actually exacerbates undernourishment by driving prices

up to 60% higher compared to international prices.

458

Alternative policy instruments (e.g. food

vouchers and cash transfer may prove to be more effective in terms of reducing

undernourishment, addressing food security, and improving the agricultural market’s

performance.

Rather than focusing on rice price stabilization, price administration, and stockholding, it has

been suggested for BULOG to be re-structured operationally, thereby shifting its mandate to

managing emergency and urgent food reserves without much direct intervention in the rice

market.

459

BULOG would then take a more neutral position as enabler of an efficient rice

agricultural market.

5.4.5 Conclusions and Lessons Learned

Indonesia’s agricultural production is still concentrated on subsistence farming and the overall

agricultural productivity of small-scale farmers lags behind due to their geographical isolation

in combination with inadequate access to agricultural extension services, markets, and

credit.

460

This is further hampered by a poor distribution segment of the agricultural

marketing system, which can be directly attributed to the poor quantity and quality of

Indonesia’s infrastructure.

In short, Indonesia’s agricultural agenda continues to be set by several bottlenecks:

Improving Indonesia’s self-sufficiency with respect to basic food products and staple

foods (e.g. rice, beef, sugar, maize, corn, and soybeans);

461

Encouraging industrial competitiveness, value-addition,

462

and the downstream

processing of agricultural products within the country.

463

This is vital for the

agricultural sector as its exports remain concentrated around primary products;

457

Interview conducted with Indonesian Agency for Agricultural Research and Development in Jakarta, July 11, 2017

458

OECD (2015), Indonesia Policy Brief – Agriculture, available at

https://www.oecd.org/policy-briefs/indonesia-agriculture-improving-food-security.pdf

[Accessed June 2017].

459

Ibid

460

IFAD (2015),

Investing in rural people in Indonesia

, pp. 20-25, IFAD: Rome.

461

FAO/INRA (2016),

Innovative markets for sustainable agriculture - How innovations in market institutions encourage

sustainable agriculture in developing countries

, p. 2, Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and

Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique.

462

FAO (2003), “WTO Agreement on Agriculture: The Implementation Experience - Developing Country Case Studies,”

available a

t http://www.fao.org/docrep/005/y4632e/y4632e00.htm#Contents [

Accessed June 2017].

463

FAO/INRA (2016),

Innovative markets for sustainable agriculture - How innovations in market institutions encourage

sustainable agriculture in developing countries

, p. 2, Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and

Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique.