Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  127 / 213 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 127 / 213 Next Page
Page Background

Improving Agricultural Market Performance:

Creation and Development of Market Institutions

113

5.3 Uganda

The purpose of this country case study is to firstly introduce Uganda’s general agricultural

market system (5.3.1), after which a selection of institutions will be evaluated into more

details (5.3.2 to 5.3.4). Conclusions and lessons learnt may be generalized and serve as

inspiration to other OIC Member Countries (5.3.5).

5.3.1 Overview of Agricultural & Food Sectors and Markets

The following section briefly describes the current situation of the five stages of Uganda’s

agricultural market system as explained in the Conceptual Framework. The selected

agricultural market institutions (Section 5.3.2) typically intervene in one or more of these

stages. The five stages include:

Production;

Handling and storage;

Processing and packaging;

Distribution and market; and

Consumption and trade.

Production

Uganda’s agricultural production structure can be marked by a two-tier system, consisting of

“traditional” and “improved” systems. While the former is characterized by limited inputs and

outputs, the latter features a certain degree of investment (e.g. fencing, irrigation, and pasture

improvement), resulting in slightly higher productivity rates. Only 18,000 km² is considered

“improved” pastures, while a large share of Uganda’s population is dependent on these areas

for their livelihood, putting considerable pressure on the capacity and natural resources of

these areas. The land tenure system in Uganda furthermore challenges the agricultural

production channel. The four systems of land tenure

218

(i.e. Customary, Freehold, Mailo, and

Leasehold) are inefficient and complicated

219

and impact land productivity in different

degrees. Most land tenure is Customary (80%), where landholders do not have a formal

entitlement but have a certification of ownership.

220

About 75% of Uganda’s agricultural output is generated by farmers with an average farm size

of 2.5 hectares

221

while 68% of Uganda’s farmers are considered subsistence farmers with less

than two hectares.

222

In the coffee sector, for instance, 500,000 small-scale farmers operate

with an average farm size of 0.2 hectares, while farm size vary from 0.5 to 10 hectares in the

cotton sector. These small-scale farmers dominate Uganda’s agricultural sector, making it an

outspokenly fragmented sector

223

though some large-scale commercial farming of cash crops

(e.g. tea, palms, rice, and sugarcane) exists. Coffee, banana, livestock, and fishing remain

activities dominated by small-scale farmers with the exception of some fish processing plants

218

FAO (2006), Country Pasture/Forage Resource Profiles,

available a

t http://www.fao.org/ag/agp/agpc/doc/counprof/uganda.htm [

Accessed May 2017].

219

Export.gov (2016), Uganda - Agriculture, available a

t https://www.export.gov/article?id=Uganda-Agriculture [

Accessed

May 2017].

220

WTO (2012),

Trade Policy Review: East African Community

, Geneva: World Trade Organization: Geneva.

221

Ibid

222

Interview conducted with National Agricultural Advisory Services in Kampala, June 8, 2017

223

Government of Uganda (2017), Agriculture, available a

t http://www.gou.go.ug/content/agriculture [

Accessed May

2017].