Background Image
Previous Page  30 / 182 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 30 / 182 Next Page
Page Background

Improving the Role of Eximbanks/ECAs in the OIC Member States

22

Almost 50 percent of countries in the Arab group have an ECA or similar program, compared to

40 percent of countries in the Asia group and about 10 percent of countries in the Africa group.

3.1.2

OIC Countries without ECAs

There are more Member Countries than not within the OIC without such institutions devoted to

financing or insuring exports. The reasons for this may vary from country-to-country, but are

likely to fall into one or more of the following five categories.

A.

There may not be a need for ECA facilities or there is lack of demand

The economic context of the country and export profile is such that commercial banks

are able to meet the needs of exporters and exports are to low risk markets. This has

been the case for Singapore, which has not established an ECA largely because of the

nature of their trade flows and the sophistication of their banking system.

B.

The needs of exporters are being met by other national entities

It could also be the case that other institutions are sufficiently covering the needs of

exporters. This would include entities such as the National Development Bank, which

lends to all companies, including exporters, and does not distinguish between exports

and domestic companies.

C.

There are needs, but there is lack of awareness on the part of exporters, banks

and the government

Exporters may have traditional buyers to whom they sell their products on open

account terms and are not concerned about the potential risks of non-payment. Banks

have insisted on cash collateral against with to lend working capital and have not asked

for guarantees or pledging of accounts receivables insurance as alternative collateral.

And, the government has not sought to understand the dynamics of trade finance and

potential gaps and opportunities that could be usefully covered.

D.

There is lack of financial resources from the government to set up a new

institution/facility

Or, it could be that the need is great, but the government does not have the financial

resources or ability to capitalize a new institution or set up a new facility, without

significant donor funds.

E.

There may have been an ECA facility in place in the past, but it expired or failed

Some countries may have experimented with having ECAs in the past and either the

pilot was not renewed, funding dried up or the experience failed because it was

improperly conceived and implemented, and the government may have suffered

significant financial and economic costs as a result. Although there is a need, the

government is unwilling to contemplate the possibility again or look at a new design or

structure.