Previous Page  76 / 143 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 76 / 143 Next Page
Page Background

COMCEC Transport and Communications

Outlook 2019

56

A large share of the road network in most OIC countries is made up of secondary or regional

roads, or other roads. However, on comparing the composition of the road network in the OIC

countries as a group to the road networks in the United States, and the European Union as a

whole, it is worth noting a big difference in the composition of the road networks in these three

categories. It is striking to see that a large percentage of the total road networks in OIC countries

are motorways and highways.

In OIC countries the proportion of the road network that is a motorway, highway, main, or

national road is almost 12.8% compared to 1.4% for the US, and 6% for the EU. This finding

suggests that the OIC Member States, as a group, are investing more in developing motorways

and highways, and not investing in developing their secondary, regional and other roads. This

focus on developing high-quality and high-volume roads requires large amounts of capital.

Given the limited resources that are available in many OIC Member States, it is very likely that

this focus results in insufficient resources being allocated to maintenance activities.

Besides, for the OIC as a whole, the length of the road network per USD 10 million GDP is about

27. For the US and the EU this number is 3.9 and 6.4, respectively. This is an important

observation insofar that it suggests that many of the OIC countries have road networks that are

too large for the size of their economy. Obviously, this has clear implications for the maintenance

of the road networks as well, i.e. the resources to properly maintain the road networks in these

countries is going to be limited.

Yet at the same time, the OIC countries as a whole have 3.12 km of roads per 1,000 population

compared to 20.7 and 11.6 for the US and EU, respectively. This might suggest that the length of

the road network is inadequate to serve the population.

Regarding road safety, statistics reveal that, UAE, Qatar, Kuwait, Oman and Saudi Arabia all have

road mortality rates that are significantly higher than what would be expected in high income

countries internationally. Of the high income countries, only Bahrain has a mortality rate

marginally below the expected norm. Besides, of the middle income countries, Libya and Iran

have remarkably high road mortality rates. For many OIC countries, road mortality seems high

which may offer opportunities to improve safety.

Regarding rail network density, all OIC countries (except Djibouti, Azerbaijan, Tunisia,

Bangladesh, Albania, Turkey, Syria, and Pakistan) have fewer than 1,000 km of rail lines per

100,000 km

2

land area, while almost half of the OIC countries have no railway network. Djibouti

with its 781 km of rail lines has the highest rail network density, whereas, Kazakhstan, has the

largest rail network with 14,329 km.

All OIC countries (except Djibouti, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, Gabon, Tunisia, and Azerbaijan)

have fewer than 200 km of rail lines per million population. At the individual country level,

Djibouti and Kazakhstan registered the highest level of rail network per capita. Average rail

network per capita of the OIC countries is equal to 92 km per million population while the world