Previous Page  85 / 225 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 85 / 225 Next Page
Page Background

Forced Migration in the OIC Member Countries:

Policy Framework Adopted by Host Countries

75

coherent migration policy. DGMM's broad authority is described in Articles 103 and 104 of the

Law on Foreigners and International Protection: Its purpose is "to implement migration

policies and strategies, ensure coordination among relevant agencies and organizations, and

carry out functions and actions related to the entry, stay and exit of foreigners in Turkey as

well as their removal, international protection, temporary protection, and the protection of

cities of human trafficking." Unsurprisingly, at less than three years old and in the midst of an

unprecedented migration crisis, DGMM has yet to fully develop the capacity to fulfill all of its

many roles and has given priority to some, such as registration of the several categories of

protected persons.

One example of the challenges facing DGMM is seen in its control of the movement of

protection beneficiaries. All protection beneficiaries have their health and education benefits

tied to residence in their province of registration. However, international protection

applicants (non-Syrians) are required to report to the PDMM of their assigned province on a

weekly basis, with failure to do so resulting in an “implicit withdrawal” of their application for

protection.

27

Article 33 of the Temporary Protection Regulation similarly authorizes

provincial governorates to introduce reporting requirements for temporary protection

beneficiaries.

28

To date, however, no such requirements have been introduced due to the

sheer number of Syrians under protection, and overburdening of DGMM Provincial

Directorates with initial registration duties.

29

Similarly, shortages of trained staff contribute to

processing backlogs.

Challenges to ensuring an efficient protection regime have also arisen in the judicial branch of

government. This field is currently experiencing a severe lack of judges and lawyers familiar

with refugee law, since it is not taught in any Turkish law school, and landmark international

asylum decisions still await translation into Turkish.

30

Furthermore, local bar associations

have been tasked with providing free legal aid (

Adli Yardım

) for protection applicants who

cannot hire their own representation, but these associations often lack expertise, and funding

for translators and court fees.

31

The Law on Foreigners and International Protection specifies that the Ministry of the Interior

"may cooperate with the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, International

Organization for Migration, and other international organizations and non-governmental

organizations for issues related to the international protection procedures set out in this Part

[of the Law]...." (Article 92). Prior to the Law, UNHCR long had assisted the Turkish National

Police, Department of Foreigners by undertaking status determination for protection

applicants, but is gradually handing this function over to DGMM and its provincial branches as

capacity to take on the function is developed. UNHCR worked closely with the Turkish

authorities to develop the Law and has continued to provide support for its implementation

27

Refugee Rights Turkey,

Country Report: Turkey

(AIDA Asylum Information Database, December 2015), 82,

http://www.asylumineurope.org/sites/default/files/report-download/aida_tr_update.i.pdf .

28

Article 71 of the Law on Foreigners and International Protection specifies the reporting requirement; applicants who fail

to fulfill it three times in a row, without being formally excused, will have their applications withdrawn. They are notified at

every stage of the procedure and have access to the administrative review and judicial appeal. Communication from DGMM

comment, received August 1, 2016.

29

Refugee Rights Turkey,

Country Report: Turkey

, 129.

30

Metin Çorabatır (President, İltica ve Göç Araştırmaları Merkezi, Ankara) in conversation with Kathleen Newland, May 2,

2016 ; Orçun Ulusoy, “Turkey as a Safe Third Country?” March 29, 2016, accessed May 5, 2016,

https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/research-subject-groups/centre-criminology/centreborder- criminologies/blog/2016/03/turkey-safe-third .

31

Refugee Rights Turkey,

Country Report: Turkey

, 101, 121; Metin Çorabatır in conversation with Kathleen Newland, May 2,

2016.