Previous Page  77 / 211 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 77 / 211 Next Page
Page Background

Skills Development: Vocational Education

in the Islamic Countries

65

Table 3.11: Industrial Contribution in TVET sector in Bangladesh (Industrial perspective)

S

ITEMS

SA

%

A

%

N

%

DA

%

SDA

%

X

1

We have a lack of skilled workers in

industries

34.3

45.7

5.7

14.3

0

4.00

2

The graduates fromTVET sectors do not

have adequate skills for current workplace

(industries)

17.1

54.3

8.6

20

0

3.69

3

Industries are working jointly with TVET

institutions to produce skilled workers

11.8

14.7

26.5

32.4

14.7

2.76

4

Industries sends staff overseas for field

training so as to equip themwith up-to-date

skills

14.3

42.9

17.1

14.3

11.4

3.34

5

Industry provide carrier guidance to

students of vocational institutions so as to

prepare them for future workforce

17.1

14.3

20

37.1

11.4

2.89

6

Industries have partnership with

institutions which provides immediate

employments

17.1

5.7

28.6

42.9

5.7

2.86

7

Both vocational institutions and industries

collaboratively organize exhibitions to

motivate young unemployed people

8.6

25.7

25.7

31.4

8.6

2.94

8

Industries are consulted during curriculum

development for vocational institutions to

improve current skill training

11.4

5.7

40

22.8

20

2.66

Table 3.11 shows that the majority of industrial participants (Item1, over 80%) acknowledged

that there is lack of skilled workers in industries and the mean (X for I=4.00) contains quite a

higher value. In the case of second item, similar opinions emerged (71.4% of industrial

participants)with amean value (X for I=3.69), which is higher than 3.5. Therefore, the statement

is accepted. In item 3, most of the participants (73.6% of industrial participants) did not agree

that the industries areworking jointly with TVET institutions to produce competent workers. In

this statement, the mean value, X for I=2.76, is below the average (less than 3.5). Hence, the

statement is not accepted. In item 4, a great number of participants (57.2%) agreed that the

industry sends their staff overseas for field training so as to equip them with up-to-date skills.

In this item, the mean value, X for I=3.34, is lower than 3.5. Thus, the statement is not accepted.

As of item 5, majority of industrial participants (68.5%) did not agree with the statement , and

the mean value (X for I=2.89) is also low (less than 3.5). In item 6, slightly more participants

(77.2%) did not agree that the industry has partnership with institutions which provide

employment. The mean value (X for I =2.86) is less than 3.5. Therefore, the statement is not

accepted. Similarly, in the next item7, more than half of the industrial participants did not agree

with the statement, and its mean value (X for I=2.94) is low as well. Hence, the statement is not

accepted. In the last item, most of the participants (82.8%) alsodid not agreewith the statement,

and themean value (X for I=2.66) is low (less than 3.5). Therefore, the statement is not accepted.

From the above discussions, we conclude that the industries should have the following

contributions:

1.

There is lack of skilled workers in industries.

2.

Graduates from TVET sectors do not have adequate skills for current workplace .

3.

Industries are not working jointly with TVET institutions

4.

Industries send their staff overseas for field training soas to equip themwith up-to-date

skills. However, the qualitative data do not support it directly.