Previous Page  203 / 277 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 203 / 277 Next Page
Page Background

Education of Disadvantaged Children in OIC:

The Key to Escape from Poverty

193

the OIC. More than half of the OIC countries spend less than 15 percent of their

government budget on education.

In the OIC there is a widespread problem of quality in education.

Low quality

education is observed as indicated by low learning achievements in comparative

assessment tests like PIRLS, TIMSS and PASEC. OIC member countries generally perform

worse compared to other participating counties in these tests. While in fact, participating

member countries should actually be achieving better outcomes given the level of

government expenditure on education.

In Chapter III of the report, case studies on countries chosen to reflect the geographic and income

level diversity of the OIC. The chapter goes into more detail using microdata analysis and in-depth

interviews along with a desk review to report the situation in these countries and the policies

employed to remove the barriers preventing children from accessing education. The case

countries are Senegal, Jordan, Pakistan and Turkey. The Human Opportunity Index is used for

these case countries to provide information about access to education along with how equal

access is, using micro level data (Demographic and Health Surveys).

511

Results show that Jordan

is and has been very good at providing education for all children while Turkey is close to Jordan

but has some way to go, especially in finishing 8 years of education. In contrast, Senegal and

Pakistan have more to do compared to Jordan and Turkey. While progress has been observed in

these countries both in access and equality in access, there remains significant scope for

improvement.

Lastly, in the Recommendations chapter of the report, distilling information from the

interventions applied across the world, in the OIC and in case countries, the responses that have

been employed and that have worked are outlined.

512

For the alleviation of the poverty barrier

, abolishing school fees coupled with

conditional cash transfers and school feeding programmes seem to work well.

For the alleviation of the location barrier

, setting up schools in existing buildings in

difficult to reach areas or building new schools works well. Another approach is to

provide free transportation to children to allow them to reach the schools that are closest.

For the alleviation of the gender barrier

, putting gender equality in education as a

priority in national strategies and plans works well. Targeting girls specifically or having

a gender perspective in the programmes is also important. Lastly, public awareness

campaigns can be implemented to change the attitudes of households.

511

See Annex 1 for methodology and the details on the calculation of the Human Opportunity Index

512

These interventions are outlined in more detail in Chapter 1 for the world in general, in Chapter 2 for the OIC countries and

in Chapter 3 for the case countries. Chapter 4 summarizes recommendations emerging from these interventions as good

examples.