Previous Page  54 / 185 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 54 / 185 Next Page
Page Background

Improving Road Safety

in the OIC Member States

44

4.2.3

Funding and resource allocation

This function relates to financing the operational budget/s of the lead agency responsible for

road safety management and the associated interventions needed to achieve the intended

results in a sustainable manner. It also pertains to the efficient allocation of resources based on

a rational evaluation framework (i.e. based on quantitative assessment of cost and benefit in

relation to stated objectives). The Country Guidelines have identified two primary tasks and the

role of the lead agency with respect to these are summarised i

n Table 5.

Table 5: Lead Agency role in funding and resource allocation

Tasks

Lead Agency Role

1.

Ensuring

sustainable

funding

sources

Reviews and makes a strong case to government for improved funding

mechanisms on the basis of in-house or external benchmarking of international

good practice;

Encourages the establishment of dedicated funding sources for road safety,

(e.g., from road user fees and road funds), which provide a means of financing

road safety outputs from different ministries; and ensures that road safety

objectives and management structure for such funds are clearly defined in

legislation;

Ensures that opportunities for additional funding from insurance and business

sectors are exploited for activity to achieve results by means of establishing

levies on insurance premiums and encouraging business sponsorship;

Earmarks funds, wherever possible, from central government to key

stakeholders at regional and local levels for key outputs set out in the national

road safety strategy;

Manages hypothecated monies from road traffic fines for safety work.

2.

Establishing

procedures

to guide the

allocation of

resources

across safety

programmes.

Reviews and estimates, often with external technical support, the value of

preventing road traffic deaths and serious injuries;

Develops and uses a nationally recognised basis for project evaluation based

on an economic appraisal of measures using the value of preventing death and

serious injury to identify priorities;

Ensures sufficient in-house lead agency capacity for the preparation of safety

budgets and allocation of resources based on a cost-effectiveness and cost

benefit analyses;

Makes proposals to other governmental partners concerning the content of

their annual budgets and ensuring that the annual performance agreements of

the key governmental stakeholders reflect their accountability for agreed road

safety strategy outputs;

Establishes specific procedures to guide allocation of resources across safety

programs;

Makes business cases to coordination bodies and Cabinet for the allocation of

resources based on a cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analyses, recognising

that road safety improvements can also meet other governmental objectives.

Source: adapted from Bliss and Breen, 2009