Previous Page  76 / 213 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 76 / 213 Next Page
Page Background

Improving Transport Project Appraisals

In the Islamic Countries

62

high quality projects co-financed by the EC. Since its creation in 2005

32

, JASPERS evolved in

terms of the types of services it undertakes. While initially it provided exclusively technical

advisory services in individual projects preparation, JASPERS currently also provides project

review and capacity building, networking and sharing of best practices.

The EC defines in secondary legislation the value of financial and social discount rates; it also

indicates the way key performance indicators (KPIs) must be calculated. It however leaves to

Member States the definition of national and regional unit values

As stated earlier, project appraisals within the WB have a rather different purpose than it does

in national administrations. This means that less attention is paid to the consistency of

evaluation conventions across WB projects. Nevertheless, in “

Investment Project Financing –

Preparing the Project Appraisal Document (PAD

)

”, guidance is given for the content and structure

of a WB Project Appraisal. According to the guidelines, a project appraisal should contain: 1.

Strategic Context, 2. Project Development Objectives, 3. Project Description, 4. Implementation,

5. Key Risks and Mitigation Measures, 6. Appraisal Summary.

The ADB has developed guidelines on the economic analysis of projects. The guidelines provide

general principles for the conduct of project economic analysis. This includes the identification

of project benefits and costs, economic valuation of benefits and costs, investment decisions and

criteria, sensitivity and risk analysis and sustainability.

2.3.4

Content

The WB’s “

Handbook on Economic Analysis of Investment Operations

” describes the analytical

tools that can be used for the economic evaluation of various effects of transport projects.

The consideration of alternative options is recognized as an important step in project evaluation.

According to the Handbook, scenario analysis can be executed throughout the project cycle by

means of with-and-without comparisons. This type of examination attempts to quantify the

incremental benefits arising from the individual project, thereby enabling decision makers to

compare the effects of different options.

The Handbook also provides an extensive guideline for the monetization of different types of

time-savings. Distinctions are made between savings in working- and commuting-time, as well

time-savings in freight transportation and public transport. This can be seen i

n Table 2.5.

32

The initiative was created in 2005 and officially launched in 2006 through a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU)

between the EC, the EIB and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) and later the KfW.

Currently, the initiative is implemented by the EC and the EIB.