Previous Page  103 / 190 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 103 / 190 Next Page
Page Background

Planning of National Transport Infrastructure

In the Islamic Countries

90

The Uganda NTMP provided the necessary framework and programming. Projects were

identified, pre-feasibility studies helped prioritized them using socio-economic and other

criteria and then following selection detailed project appraisals made. There appears to be

minimal political interference in the process of project selection in Uganda, possibly because

there is so much infrastructure investment.

Transport Infrastructure receive the largest share of the available capital expenditure in the

national budget. Of the UDX 23 trillion budget works and transport will receive 20.1%

36

or UGX

4.6 trillion or about $1.2 Billion. This represents a huge commitment by the Government to

infrastructure and faith in its ability to stimulate the economy and improve the lives of its

citizens. It must be pointed out that there is no direct reference to the NTMP 2008-2023 in the

formulation of the 2018/19 budget although its intellectual influence is apparent. It is important

to note that 55% of the funding for transport infrastructure is from international funding

agencies. Their heavy commitment also means that they have a positive influence to the

processes of planning, implementation and evaluation.

From discussions with local officials and responses to the questionnaire it is considered that

level of consultation and stakeholder participation in NTI planning that includes other sectors

other than transport planning institutions is good. From meetings with district councils in the

south west of Uganda that involved the expert, there appeared to have been some consultations.

The Uganda National Roads Authority Act stipulates that the ‘Authority shall, in achieving its

purposes under section 2 take into account and give effect to the following to consult and

cooperate with departments, branches and agencies of the government and with utility agencies

in the interests of improving accessibility to, or within, any area in Uganda’. The inclusion of

assessment of transport user needs (market survey/research) to shape the transport agenda is

carried out as far as the road user is concerned as shown in the survey data that it mentioned in

this case study. However, the extent to which transport investment decision making includes

the assessment of users’ affordability need much further development in Uganda. All public

transport is operated privately and there is no control of fares. Unfortunately, the extent of

private funding of transport services and infrastructure has not been estimated, but it is

important to do so. The examination of alternative solutions included in planning procedure in

order to come up with optimized investments decisions is carried out by the consultants that

are engaged to make the studies.

For example, KCCA policy is to have a pro transit orientated and has considered various types of

mass public transport in their part of the NTMP and these include Light Rail and Bus Rapid

Transit. The Plan objectives depend on the role of the private sector though specifity of

subsidisation is vague and funding is vague. Moreover, the need for a Greater Kampala

Metropolitan Area to promote and sponsor the Transit Systems has yet to gain a political

foothold. The coordination between local authorities in promoting integrated land use and

transport solutions cannot be overstated.

36

Available fro

m http://allafrica.com/stories/201705220476.html