Previous Page  179 / 197 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 179 / 197 Next Page
Page Background

Destination Development and

Institutionalization Strategies

In the OIC Member Countries

169

DMO Funding

Having sufficient and sustainable funding is one of the main challenges of DMOs. Possible funding

models are discussed in detail in Section 2.4.

Typically, DMOs either receive direct funding from the government or receive funding from a

hotel room tax and membership fees, or a combination of all. Public DMOs typically receive

funding from the government in addition to hotel room taxes. Whereas public-private DMOs

mainly rely on the portion of hotel room taxes allocated to them in addition to membership fees,

and revenue from sponsorships and promotional activities.

In general, it is best for a DMO to diversify its funding sources to ensure financial stability and to

be better funded to support more projects. Ideally DMOs should receive a combination of direct

government funding, funding generated from tourism taxes, such as the hotel room tax, as well as

funding from local businesses, through membership fees, sponsorship, or joint funding for

projects. As destinations become more developed, DMOs should increasingly rely on self-funding.

Examples of self-funding include advertising revenue from both print as well as the DMO’s

website, membership revenue from fees charged to companies, revenue from selling city passes

online as well as commission from ticket sales. In the US, several DMOs obtain additional revenue

through ads on their website, in addition to attraction and activity bookings from the DMO

website. However, these revenue source are supplementary and the main funding sources are

tourism taxes and Tourism Improvement Districts (TIDs), which are discussed in detail in section

2.4.

449

There is not one correct funding model as it depends on each country’s overall tourism budget,

legislation, willingness of the industry to support the DMO and other factors. However, it is not

advised that the DMO generate revenue from selling products or services as this takes away from

its core role and also creates a conflict of interest with the local tourism industry.

In the US, there are small DMOs like in Salt City, Utah, with a $6 million budget, while Houston,

Texas has about a $75 million budget, while Las Vegas’ budget is $260 million. They all do a good

job, while there are bureaus that have a $75-100 million budget that do not do a good job, and it

mostly comes down to leadership, and the leadership’s ability to organize effectively, properly

staff the DMO and garner community support. Destinations that seem to do the best often have

extremely engaged communities.

450

Cross River Tourism Bureau in Nigeria recently lost its government funding and is expected to

run revenue-generating activities. It is also applying for international grants related to

environmental conservation.

In Nigeria, the government released a law called the Tourism Development Levy Law, which

made it mandatory for hospitality sector providers to charge an extra 5% of the consumer spend.

These funds go into a government managed fund and are used for events, industry training, and

other purposes.

451

However, it is clear from interviews with tourism stakeholders in Nigeria that

449

SimpleView provides a tool that allows DMOs to display relevant ads on their websites. They also offer a solution that allows DMOs to

sell tickets to attractions, activities, and tours through their website.

450

Interview with CEO, SimpleView

451

Interview with Managing Director, Cross River Tourism Bureau