Previous Page  139 / 180 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 139 / 180 Next Page
Page Background

Risk & Crisis Management in Tourism Sector:

Recovery from Crisis

in the OIC Member Countries

129

Specifically in terms of tourism, in 2005 the government introduced Tourism Act. No. 38 which

reorganized the management of the tourism sector. It came into effect in 2007 with four

organizations, namely: the Sri Lanka Tourism Development Authority (SLTDA); The Sri Lanka

Tourism Promotions Bureau (SLTPB), which handles marketing and promotion of tourism; the Sri

Lanka Institute of Tourism and Hotel Management to manage the human resources and Hotel

Schools, and the Sri Lanka Convention Bureau. The government constituted also the Tourism

Development Fund, made up from 33% of Airport Tax (effectively a departure tax) and 1% of the

turnover of all establishments registered with Sri Lanka Tourist Board (Buultgens et al, 2016).

Putting these new structures in place meant that immediately after the end of the conflict in 2009,

tourism in Sri Lanka was well placed to build on its recovery. International arrivals recorded a

compound annual growth rate of almost 20% between 2009 and 2016 and a compound annual

growth rate of about 31% in foreign exchange earnings over the same period, while in terms of

direct employment, jobs in tourism have almost tripled from 52,071 in 2009 to 146,115 in 2016

(SLTDA, 2012; Bhandari and Goel, 2017).

In 2010 the government announced a development policy framework –Vision for the Future –

which included a focus on sustainable development and diversification of the tourism sector, with

the stated aim of providing benefits to all segments of society. As part of this, the six-year Tourism

Development Strategy (2011-2016) outlined as its main strategic targets the diversification of the

tourismoffer, focusing on newmarkets, development of the infrastructure, improving services and

human resources, promoting domestic tourism, enhancing industry professionalism, and

conserving the environment. Although the hoped-for increase in jobs to 500,000 by 2016 was not

borne out, in terms of tourism earnings the official figure released by SLTDA for 2016 was US$

3,518.5million., much higher than the amount of US$ 2,750million. targeted in the strategy (SLTDA,

2012).

In order to regulate future tourism development projects, the government announced 45 tourism

zones, including locations in the northeast of the country. Each zone had a specific theme for

marketing purposes. These zones were intended to attract foreign investors in the high-endmarket

including hotels as well as recreational and sport establishments, shopping centers and light

aircraft services (Buultgens et al, 2016). In order to attract more investors in tourism, the

government offered tax incentives on project investments exceeding US$ 500,000. It also

announced a Unit for National Investment in Tourism, the ‘One Stop Unit (OSU), as a centralized

contact point for investors seeking information on the tourism industry, including help with all

formalities. Further efforts to attract investors and enhance economic development after 2009

included modernising the infrastructure in the island, including roads, railways, ports and air

transportation. In addition, improvements in power and telecom sectors are also underway

(Bhandari and Goel, 2017).