Background Image
Previous Page  209 / 236 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 209 / 236 Next Page
Page Background

Preferential Trade Agreements and Trade Liberalization Efforts in the OIC Member States

With Special Emphasis on the TPS-OIC

183

reduction. In the case of Pakistan, for example, only 34.4% of the tariff lines imported from Jordan

will be liberalised; however, when the value of trade is considered, it can be seen that these lines

cover nearly 89% of the imports from Jordan. Similar situations apply to the Pakistan imports from

Bangladesh.

Note, however, that the actual effect of the Fast Track, might be different as we need to consider the

effect on tariff lines without trade. A reduction in the tariff applied that eliminates the "water" in the

tariff might generate trade in products where there is no trade at present

43

. Unfortunately, it is not

possible to identify the level of the current water in the applied tariff and, therefore, what the

imports would be should the tariff be eliminated.

In general, the Fast Track is expected to have an amplified trade effect between the same pair of

countries identified when the normal schedule was presented. However, it would still have minimal

effects on the trade between countries already having FTAs or where there are unilateral

preferences. This implies it is probably only the imports of Pakistan, Jordan and Bangladesh that are

expected to be substantially affected by Fast Track liberalisation. Ultimately the final effect would

depend on

the

products

that are

included

in the

respective

negative lists.

43

Water in the tariff is the difference between the applied tariffs and the autarky tariff or the tariff that stops imports.

Note that this is different concept to the binding overhang resulting from the "Dirty" tarification process of the WTO

Uruguay Round.