Background Image
Previous Page  180 / 236 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 180 / 236 Next Page
Page Background

Preferential Trade Agreements and Trade Liberalization Efforts in the OIC Member States

With Special Emphasis on the TPS-OIC

154

Table 30: TPS-OIC MFN Simple Average Tariff 1995-2012

Reporter

1995

2000

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

Bahrain

5.24

5.17

4.73

4.73

4.73

4.77

4.77

Bangladesh

21.64

15.3

Jordan

22.09 13.57

Malaysia

7.31

7.18

7.17

6.88

6.95

Oman

5.04

5

5.23

5.22

5.22

4.49

Pakistan

50.84

14.24 14.25 14.02 13.42

13.9

Qatar

5.03

Saudi Arabia

11.95

4.76

Turkey

9.44

9.58

9.65 10.03

9.71

9.49

9.91

9.62

UAE

4.9

Source: Trains via WITS

5.1.

EXAMINING THE LIBERALISATION COMMITMENTS

Compared to other PTA agreements including some of those discussed in the preceding section, as

well as earlier in the report the mandatory commitments that are embodied in the TPS-OIC are

somewhat low. The reductions in tariffs are covered by Articles 3 and 4 of the agreement. Article 3,

which is referred to as the normal track contains actual obligations with regard to tariff reductions

on the participating members states. Article 4, which is referred to as the fast track is voluntary.

According to Art. 3 of the PRETAS, 7% of the tariff lines are required to be covered by the agreement

implying that around 93% of the products will not be affected by the agreement. The number of lines

to be covered by the agreement applicable to Least Developed Members is only 1%. As for the para-

tariff and non-tariff barriers, upon entry into force of the PRETAS they will be eliminated (in the case

of the LDCs in 3 years).

Any member whose MFN tariffs are less than 10% in more than 90% of the products are required to

liberalise only 1% of the tariff lines. This is the case for all the GCC members whose MFN tariffs (with

the exception of alcoholic beverages) are all below 5%. The low level of coverage contrasts notably

with the agreements negotiated or under negotiation where the level of coverage is substantially

more important. It is worth remembering, as discussed earlier in the report, it is generally accepted

that in order to meet the GATT’s ART XXIV provisions, no less than 90% of trade should be

liberalised. For example, in the EU-EPAs negotiations, although the EU liberalised 100% of their

products, ACP countries had to commit to liberalisation in no less than 80%, hence achieving the

90% "substantially all" clause on average. With other agreements the level of coverage is even higher

as we have seen previously in this report.