Enhancing Public Availability of Customs Information
In the Islamic Countries
32
Current State of Play
Figure 12 shows results for the TFIs, for the latest year available 2017. The first fact that is
apparent is that Singapore scores much higher than any of the OIC regional averages on all four
dimensions taken from the TFIs. Looking within the OIC, it is clear that the African Group on
averages performs less strongly than the other groups, although the difference is much more
pronounced in relation to appeal procedures, for example, than in relation to involvement of the
trade community. In general, the Asian Group is the strongest performing OIC regional group,
followed by the Arab Group, and then the African Group.
Figure 12: Average TFI scores by component, OIC regional groups, 2017.
Source: OECD TFIs.
It is important to go beyond group averages, however, to look at individual country scores. With
this in mind, Figure 13 considers the African Group, looking separately on performance on each
of the four pillars. There is clearly a mix of scores that varies substantially across countries,
although all are well below the maximum possible score of 2. Senegal, Nigeria, and Cameroon
stand out as having strong scores relative to the group average on most pillars. In general,
involvement of the trade community is the area where countries have their highest scores.
Smaller, lower income countries tend to have the greatest performance differences with respect
to the global best practice frontier, as is to be expected. More details on the considerations that
go into making Senegal, for instance, a relatively strong performer can be found in the relevant
case study in Section 4.
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
Information
Availability
Involvement of the
Trade Community
Advance Rulings
Appeal Procedures
African
Arab
Asian
Singapore