Previous Page  43 / 194 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 43 / 194 Next Page
Page Background

Authorized Economic Operator Programs

In the Islamic Countries:

Enhancing Customs-Traders Partnership

33

constant interaction with other government authorities (OGA) and other stakeholders. The EU

Strategy and Action Plan for Customs risk management includes cooperation between the AEO

program and these authorities with the objective of ensuring security while avoiding

burdensome or redundant procedures and costs for both parties. In the case of the EU,

cooperation with other OGA covers areas such as aviation security, maritime transport and

exports controls.

Mutual Recognition

In the case of the EU, AEOS and AEOF members are eligible to take part at MRAs. These

operators are hence considered safe and secure, and are less likely to undergo further

procedures or requirements.

Recognizing the importance of MRAs, the EU has concluded and implemented Mutual

Recognition of AEO programs with Norway and Switzerland (July 2009), Japan (June 2010),

Andorra (January 2011), the US (May 2012) and China (May 2014). MRAs with other

important trade partners are currently under negotiation. The EU also provides technical

assistance to a number of countries in preparation for future MRAs.

2.3 Evaluation of the AEOs

As it was mentioned before, AEO programs aim at improving the Customs performance in

order to speed up administrative procedure. The objective of this section is to evaluate the

outcome of different AEO programs by looking at different measures of the Customs

performance.

More specifically, the evaluation of the Japanese AEO program shows that it has four important

characteristics (Sawafuji, 2011): First, the AEO program led to a significant decrease in time to

trade. While the AEO program in Japan was preceded by different programs that improved the

Customs procedures, this program significantly reduced clearance time for AEO operators. In

fact, in 1991 a “Pre-Arrival Documentary Examination” was adopted and decreased the time

required from arrival to release from 26 to 20 hours. Later, in 1997, a “One-Stop on-line

service” was implemented and time of clearance reached 5.6 hours. With the “Simplified

Import Declaration” and “First Single Window” in 2003 and “Second Single Window” in 2006,

clearance to clear goods reached 3.3 hours. After adopting the AEO program in 2006, clearance

time was almost 30 times lower for AEO compared to non-AEO (0.1 and 3.1 hours

respectively). This points out the significant improvement in the Customs procedures as an

outcome of the AEO program.

Second, the AEO program was significantly effective in coordination and consultation with

different stakeholders in improving its AEO program. Indeed, it coordinates with the private

sector to obtain its input on the AEO program and takes into consideration its feedback in

implementation. For instance, they modified the Customs Acts legislation governing the

program itself based on the traders’ needs and feedback. Second, it has continuous

government-private sector consultation mechanisms to discuss promoting and implementing

the AEO program. Moreover, the AEO Center has also participated in several business seminars

to present the AEO program to private sector counterparts.