Previous Page  181 / 235 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 181 / 235 Next Page
Page Background

Facilitating Trade:

Improving Customs Risk Management Systems

In the OIC Member States

169

Missing

2

2

2

2

2

Mean

57.066

156.425

208.636

684.293

882.522

Mode

15.990

90.000

161.000

147.000

478.000

Std. Deviation

18.354

100.356

124.386

470.583

468.805

Skewness

-0.373

1.631

0.688

2.421

0.526

Std. Error of

Skewness

0.322

0.322

0.322

0.322

0.322

80.980

575.000

568.000

2878.000

2256.000

Minimum

15.990

14.000

8.000

40.000

0.000

Maximum

96.970

589.000

576.000

2918.000

2256.000

Source: Author’s compilation

Albania ranks highest (minimum value), while Yemen ranks lowest of the 189. There is not a big

difference between the data for 2016 and those for 2017, but there are still opportunities for

improvement for many OIC MS.

The comparative analysis of the trade costs and time to import and export on OIC MS average

level with developed countries such as EU MS shows that the average of OIC MS has higher costs

and time based on border and documentary compliance. The similar results are for the CEFTA

MS that sign the pre-accession Agreement with EU, due to the implementation of the EU acquis

related to the common EU customs domain.

Figure 60: Trade Costs and Time Comparative Analysis between OIC MS, EU, CEFTA and

ASEAN

Source: Author’s compilation

Data on time and costs for border and documentary compliance are presented in Figure 60. The

basic statistics are given i

n Table 41.

There is not much difference between the data for 2016

and 2017, but there is a large difference between the best and the worst OIC MS regarding