Previous Page  189 / 203 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 189 / 203 Next Page
Page Background

Special Economic Zones in the OIC Region:

Learning from Experience

168

Where possible incentive frameworks should be standardised at the country level to ensure that

competition between zones within a single state does not result in the adoption of unsustainable

packages of incentives which may undermine economic performance and achieve ‘value for

money’. In addition, examples from successful SEZ programmes within OIC Member Countries

and globally indicates that incentives packages which include ‘sunset clauses’ benefit from

avoiding unsustainable guarantees of fiscal incentives.

Targeted Incentive Frameworks

Locus Economica - legal SEZ experts - recommend that incentive frameworks should typically

be based on:

Low reliance on tax holidays and other fiscal incentives;

Simplicity of taxes (maximum three to four taxes);

Avoidance of duplication of national tax administration; and

Elimination of indirect taxes.

Very importantly, fiscal incentives should be focused on the sectors and strategies which are

being targeted by the proposed zone programme and should not be used as the main

differentiator between competing zones. There should ideally be a clear and transparent link

between national economic priorities, target industry-sectors suitable for the SEZ programme

and associated incentivisation.

Examples from Case Studies

Ethiopia – Bole Lemi Industrial Park

The Bole Lemi Industrial Park created a strong incentives package whichwas developed through

well-coordinated government agencies aimed at targeting specific investors to mitigate existing

concerns and weaknesses within the Ethiopian investment environment. This included pro-

active investment strategies and well-designed investment legislation and regulation which has

resulted in a more attractive investment proposition within the zone.

Malaysia – Penang FIZs

Incentives within the Penang FIZ are determined at the federal level by the Malaysian

government which offers a comprehensive range of incentives targeted at priority sectors and

industries. Malaysia has historically taken a pro-active approach to incentive programmes,

transitioning from export orientated incentives prevalent at the beginning of their FIZ

programmes and moving to incentives aimed at technology transfer, R&D activities and skills

and training initiatives as they have sought to facilitate a shift to higher value added activities

and industries.