Previous Page  22 / 194 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 22 / 194 Next Page
Page Background

Reducing Postharvest Losses

In the OIC Member Countries

8

INTRODUCTION

Background

Agriculture is an important, often crucial, economic driver for livelihoods in many of the

Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) Member Countries, contributing 9% of GDP in 2013

and employing over 20% of the workforce (OIC, 2015). Therefore, the OIC Member Countries,

through its Standing Committee for Economic and Commercial Cooperation (COMCEC), aim to

maximise the contribution of agriculture to socio-economic development. One key area for

concern is, in the face of rising populations, increased urbanisation, climate variability and

other long-term global trends, to address the aspect of overall food availability through

reducing food loss and waste.

Failure of all the food produced in the world to be consumed and to provide its full potential

for nutrition has long been recognized as an important brake on global food efficiency and

productivity

1

(Hodges et al, 2011, World Bank, 2011). More recently, concerns about

population growth and the impact on the planet of unconstrained food losses and waste have

been heightened by the Sustainable Development Goals (UN, 2015). The SDGs call for the

world to reduce per capita food waste by 50% by 2030.

Several recent studies have attempted to estimate the volume of food lost in the global supply

chain. The figure that is most pervasive tends to be that used by the Food and Agricultural

Organisation of the United Nations of one third of all food not reaching the final consumer

(Gustavsson et al., 2011). Whilst the method of measuring and valuing this loss can be

disputed, the factor cost in terms of nutrition, energy, water, labour, and capital of food being

produced and then not consumed is clearly vast. Consuming unsafe food could also be

included in this calculation and this would surely provide additional impetus for action by

policy makers.

Postharvest loss reduction offers the particular advantage of increasing food availability

without requiring additional land, water, labour and agricultural inputs for additional

production. Better postharvest management and the associated loss reduction will also help to

build resilience against current and future climate-related shocks, and reduce the need for

compensatory agricultural extensification, land use change and damage to environmental

services, including carbon sequestration.

There have been many different definition of postharvest food loss and waste and ways of

locating it within agricultural commodity value chains. One commonly adopted is that of the

World Resources Institute (WRI) which considers food loss to occur before products reach

consumers and food waste to be a near consumer issue of under-utilisation. COMCEC has

adopted the following definitions:

On-Farm losses

: all losses during the agricultural production stage until completion of

harvesting.

Postharvest losses

: food damage or degradation of food during different stages of the food

supply chain (both quantitative and qualitative); and,

1

Kissinger speech to the World Food Conference in Rome, 1974, quoted in Bourne, 1977:2