Previous Page  159 / 194 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 159 / 194 Next Page
Page Background

Reducing Postharvest Losses

In the OIC Member Countries

145

5.4.1.

Global and Regional Resources

This has already been discussed in the COMCEC on-farm losses study which also discussed

resources for postharvest losses. Recent initiatives in addition to those mentioned include the

Bill and Melinda Gates Funded APHLIS PLUS project and the EC FP7 Gains for losses from Root

and Tuber Crops.

We anticipate that studies and actions targeting postharvest losses will continue to be a funded

to explore research and extension to reduce food losses and waste along food value chains.

APHLIS PLUS is extending the concept of postharvest losses to include nutrition and economic

losses which to date have not been systematically examined. In the following sections, staple

foods such as cereals, roots, tubers and fruit, and vegetables continue to currently receive the

bulk of the funding. Only a handful are exploring economic losses (EC FP7 Gains from Looses

of Root and Tuber Crops and APHLIS PLUS) but more projects of this type are anticipated.

Individual OIC Member Countries are increasingly part of global and regional alliances. They

have access to the CGIAR system and their many research institutes.

5.4.2.

International Projects and Programs

A number of international project and programs have been recently funded by the UN, Bill and

Melinda Gates Foundation, Rockefeller, European Union and through the CGIAR system via a

basket of international donors.

The majority of projects, programmes and studies on postharvest food losses have so far

focussed on cereals and to a lesser extent fruit and vegetables and root and tuber crops. The

focus has been mainly on measuring physical losses and to a less extent economic losses.

Recently the APHLIS PLUS project will widen the scope from physical losses to economic and

nutrition losses. The EU FP7 Gains from losses on root and tuber crops clearly showed that

economic losses are more critical than physical losses whereby two value chains for cassava

can have similar levels of physical losses but massively different economic losses depending on

whether the losses occur at the farm end or at the consumer end (Naziri et al, 2015). We

expect nutritional losses to equally critical.

Projects and Programs - Cereals

Table

reports projects mentioned by participants in the online survey. The authors have not

confirmed the validity of the projects and this list may omit many other projects.

Table 74: Projects on cereals

Name of project

Target

crop/

product

Name of lead

organisation

Country

Starting

year

Website

Postharvest management in

Sub-Saharan Africa

Cereals

and pulses

HelvetasSwissI

ntercooperatai

on

Benin,

Mozambiq

ue

2013

www.helvetas.org

Market Linkage Project

Grains

Carana

Corporation

Malawi

2009 -

2011

http://www.caran a.com/projects/su

bsaharanafrica/42

3-market-linkages-

initiative